Friday, April 28, 2017

#57.10 Perspective - The Mission

Now lately, we have examined the association between money and will, also called FIAT. We have nothing personally against anyone, especially those among the “gold bugs.” But honestly, they are blinded by their tacit acceptance of THEIR (the usual criminal classes) economics; specifically because “gold bugs” accept without much serious thought, the ideas of defunct economists. 

We lump THEIR economists into two main groups forming one of THEIR dialectics; the Keynesians (fiscal manipulation of the economy) after Lord John Maynard Keynes, the British economist and the “Austrians” who are mostly nothing but proponents of a return to DEFUNCT 19th century banking practices with a gold backed money still subject to fractional reserve lending and of course, usury. 

Let's make it absolutely clear one more time exactly what we're talking about: USURY is the practice of always taking back more than was originally created. It always creates an unnatural scarcity in the money supply at any moment and STEALS VALUE FROM EVERYONE using the monetary system. It is WRONG by sheer mathematical logic and is the root and cause of ALL the trouble with the present monetary system. It can't be fixed. It will fail. We must have our own system and own own money.

And secondly, most financial institutions got the idea that THEY are entitled to issue money they don't even have and charge interest on it. THEIRS is the mother of ALL entitlements. Without this FRAUD upon the public, THEY would be powerless. We will have our own system that specifically and forever makes it impossible for you to lend money that you do not have and that you will never ask back more money than was lent. All rent of money is to be paid up front in already existing money or it is customary financing, where a third party buys something a buyer can't afford and sells it back to him on terms. In this case all the money must exist before transactions are enabled.

We're sorry (not really), but there is no help among THEIR economics because ALL economics to date has assumed the existence of both usury – the taking back of that which was never created and fractional reserve lending – the lending of money one does not have. We likewise part company with all those assuming an unbridled capitalism: the making of money on money without work and an itch with their excess capital.

Work we consistently define as the time out of one's life when one is paid in money for one's time or labor. Capitalism is said to be equal to private enterprise. But, no, it isn't. Free or PRIVATE enterprise we consider the bedrock upon which any economies (the movement of money) must rest. Capitalism is just the ability of the rich to make more on their riches. We'll place very obvious limitations to all of that as it too is STEALING on steroids. So, I beg your pardon, I'm not rich enough to be a capitalist, but I sure as hell have talents and skills that I can easily trade for money, were I to issue it and it be accepted by my peers around the world, since there would be one standard, the Valun.

There is NOTHING that requires the association of private enterprise with capitalism. They are distinctly different and their common association in most people's minds is clear evidence of a propaganda campaign on behalf of THEM who are the authors of both capitalism and STATE socialism. If you allow the THEFT that is capitalism, you must inevitably allow state socialism (not our natural socialism as a temporary measure) or “the masses” would have revolted long ago. What do the rulers say? The people are revolting. 

But it's actually the rich who are revolting and down through time have always been revolting. These are the people with so much money that they can't think up enough ways to waste as much as they make in a week. What's revolting about this situation is that they get to have more and more ready calls against resources, can buy whatever they want, without work. Not a single one of them spends an hour out of the rest of their lives to earn their money on money. That, my friends is capitalism; all the ways the people with more money to live on “invest” it in assets called “securities” which are really nothing but pieces of paper denoting either ownership of some minuscule part of some corporation or the debt of some such corporation, or some public agency or government. All prices are supposedly based on supply and demand but there are market makers everywhere engaged in raising money to keep these concerns (more social machines) going and selling off their debt instruments for various fractional discounts to make their profit. Those that service the capitalists engage in nothing productive. Don't tell me any different: I've been there and done that.

All that being said, the idea of even small holders that have next to nothing holding silver and gold as insurance against the savageries of the banker's “credit cycles” is very prudent, as certainly the bankers themselves always scramble to grab as much of the precious metals as they can. THEY (globalists, BANKERS, elites, pedophiles, satanists, technocrats, scribes Pharisees, etc.) still run the show: it is either THEIR credit or THEIR gold and THEY determine the value of that in exchange in all the other brands of THEIR money. The same is true of bitcoin, which is nothing more than a fake scarce commodity, always subject to speculation.

The idea of making a distinction between precious metals and paper or digital currency is IDIOTIC (you do not know enough to make such a suggestion) so it is best to tell everyone out there the truth about precious metals:

1) ALL precious metals have human blood on them. They have been the subject of wars of conquest down through time and were mined by slaves usually worked to death under the most horrific conditions because THEY wanted to keep the acquisition of gold as cheap as possible and always have sought that down through time. It marks the basis for THEIR disregard and disrespect of all human labor.

2) ALL precious metals are controlled by the same people who run the banks: they own all the mines and determine the values through THEIR private trading syndicates which none but THEY control. The same issues also affect precious stones; another of THEIR rackets. THEIR other traditional rackets on which all prior empires were built include the trade in human beings as slaves or to be devoured and destroyed in the case of children, of drugs (we heard spices in school) and of weapons of all kinds including poisons and explosives. The link between the bankers and the weapons makers is thousands of years old.

3) ALL precious metals were FORCED on people to use as money, just as today the underlying reasons for wars everywhere involve the scope and reach of the banks. Ideas that circulate that assume precious metals were accepted freely for use as money are DEVOID OF HISTORICAL EVIDENCE because the overwhelming evidence supports the use of military FORCE, not freedom of choice for the use of precious metals as money. 

All that being said, you should still own some and have it in your possession, not locked up somewhere in someone else's possession. But if it becomes so valuable relative to anything else (NOT POSSIBLE) then it doesn't circulate, because the reverse of Gresham's law is an actual natural law: the cheaper the intrinsic value of the means of exchange, the more it will circulate and perform the split-barter function of money. 

We also said, and we mean it as it is OBVIOUS and COMMON SENSE, that ANY commodity serving as money will itself contribute to the price in any exchange where it is used. So with precious metals, we have someone in some far away city deciding from day to day how much a said chunk of said metal one proffers in exchange for whatever one is buying is capable of exchanging, value for value, splitting barter in a trade. The result is still fluctuating prices and they can be as much as 25% within 12 months even in the most stable of markets. And who then determines those prices? Certainly not the holder of the commodity used as money. So how “free” is he/she? 

While we're at it, let's knock another hole in one; money vs. currency. Money is nothing but ONE EYE. That's what the word literally means and usually it refers to coins. The old fashioned banker way of distinguishing the two was COIN vs. currency. Currency was just notes issued by the central bank in various denominations. Currency is extended to include any digital exchange between accounts, therefore verifying our assertion that visible emblems of money; coins, notes, checks, etc. are nothing but tokens of the monetary machine which includes all the back office accounting; NO MONEY EXISTS WITHOUT ACCOUNTING FOR IT. It doesn't matter what the circulating tokens are made of. They could be made of old cheese and it wouldn't matter. Silver and gold? It's still THEIR money. 

So here's what we do with any of it. If you are a member, and acting as an A member of your local exchange, then you have an account there. If you bring in any of THEIR money, we will reduce any and all of it to silver and gold, which shall be exchanged for Valuns and those Valuns will either be available to you as V-Checks or for deposit into your account. There is no valid exchange from our money back into THEIRS: this is not a money laundry or a “buy and hold” commodity. The precious metals shall belong to the local exchange and be used to clear any taxes and state imposed expenses the exchange incurs. The amount of each (silver or gold) that exchange for Valuns is determined by THEM, since all the money to be exchanged is THEIR money. 

Today a proposed International Standard Value Unit or Valun trades for $2.74 (4/26/17) making it among the heaviest means of exchange available. That price is based on the prices of gold and silver, and how those prices have fallen from the inception values of $2.16 (11/2/11 an easy day to remember). You see, our money isn't based on a commodity. It's based on a piece of purchasing power that has already passed, that will not change over time. We measure what all of THEIR money is priced, based on the prices of the precious metals plus a reasonable bid price to obtain the daily value of a piece of purchasing power that happened back on 11/2/11. 

Now last weekend, I saw two first cousins help erect a shed on one of their properties. No money was exchanged, therefore this time out of their lives that could have earned payment for each in money was not accounted for; their labor at that time was lost to both as a further means of exchange in their community. Likewise a younger sister giving up some of her time to help an older sister with her children, frequently would help without payment. In fact, it could be easily proved that especially when times are tough and money is scarce, most work is done without pay; volunteered and in so doing, the value of labor is further reduced and the opportunities to earn the means to split barter for things one might actually need or want, rendered as missed opportunities to express one's innate wealth. Why? Because time is scare and you're wealth has a right to earn an income, that's why. Hold onto that one and consider this: 

We are just now apprised that 80% comes from 20%. If we got 20% of the volunteer work to accept Valuns instead, we'd have a real economy in Valuns underway. How are they paid? If it is a one time only matter, the one cousin or sister offers the other some V-Checks. It may be common to hear, “I'll give you 5 to do it.” V5 or Five Valuns is currently $13.70 of purchasing power. If more than one series of events is anticipated, a labor contract stipulates the terms and the local exchange takes care of the transactions. Another phrase might be, “I'll do it for 5 and 3,” meaning five Valuns and $3. A whole variety of teachers and practitioners can operate with their customers this way. 

Concerning volunteer occupations in families or among close friends, we are somewhat curious to know why payment in money has NOT been done very much before and we have our ready answer; the money is not ours and of course it is naturally scarce. Since it is not fundamentally ours or of us, issued out of us, we naturally tend to regard it as a foreign device or series of devices and consciously or not, since we do not have much of it and there are certainly plenty of ready claims on any we do have, all of this enhances our trends toward volunteerism and opportunities to express and profit from each of our innate wealth are lost. 

We saw an ad recently that made the claim that saved money was stored labor. That's only true close to the time the labor became earned money if we are using any “public” money, as all of that is guaranteed to lose its purchasing power, whereas the proposed Valun is designed to retain its purchasing power, which is why it can outlast all the other money. What will outlast all the other money? The tokens? NO! We remind all those who think otherwise that one cannot have money, an economy, a civilization, unless we are economically reliant on each other as indeed we are now, the machine we use is not ours, hence all the present disabilities. A man with a mountain of gold may be rich but if no one else has any, no one else needs any. We need our own. 

Representing the E. C. Riegel paradigm of money based on a fixed transaction representing a specific time referenced piece of purchasing power instead of a commodity has become a personal mission. It was given me by someone who knew the inside and out of the present machine better than I will, who knew that in the long run it was doomed. And a return to precious metals will not save THEIR machine, because THEY will not give up THEIR fundamental means of stealing from the rest of us; usury and fractional reserve lending. Changing to a gold backed money (going backwards into the 19th century) does not change either of these as givens.
 
Since THEY will certainly not give up THEIR errors, it is long past time for the rest of us to start our own machine going based on our own value, not some stinking pile of blood soaked precious metals. Besides which, should anyone really care, the best place for stores of precious metals is not in a series of central banks, but scattered among a network of local exchanges that will keep those metals OFF the market thereby tending to force the prices of precious metals up not down.

In any case, a very few people, perhaps 20% everywhere could get a sizable economy going; enough to equal the 80% already produced by the sagging whole. It is my mission to get more people to see the obvious realities I see and to see the remedy as proposed. It is indeed the most humanitarian and egalitarian proposal and yet allows each community, each group down to the individual to devise one's own livelihood. Please read this blog more thoroughly, and give the proposal your serious consideration and spread the links among your family and friends. If thoughts be real tangible things and that they produce effects, think about what this could mean to the world, to alter reality for the better, to eliminate poverty and war, forever, before it is too late. 

David Burton 

Current Hypothetical Value of a Hypothetical Value Unit  
 
[5/1/17: Q: Are you suggesting that volunteer work or volunteerism is wrong? Because if you are, you have no idea how many people would be hurt by this idea of yours! We need volunteers or many services for people in need would simply collapse. Beth in Arkansas.

A: Congratulations. What you say is proving my point. ALL volunteer work is still time out of the normal unpaid time of the volunteer's life. Since that time is unpaid, the value the volunteer sacrifices to the volunteer effort is lost in terms of future barter; it is a trade of something for nothing. If all volunteers suddenly quit working, what would happen? The state would have to do something or what? Or nature would take its course and those at the bottom of the system would be neglected and die off, that's what would happen and that's what THEY at the top actually want and have long since written of THEIR plans.

Meanwhile, this proposal would suggest that all present volunteer work really must be paid for and if not THEIR money, then whose better than the volunteers and the people being served themselves? If any of THEIR money is paid in addition to Valuns, it should be understood that all of it is to go back to THEM as taxes. Remember, the proposed Valun system is NOT a tax dodge and there will be taxes to pay in THEIR money at the end of the usual tax season. Since all earning under the Valun system is not strictly tied to any particular work schedule, nor is it understood as originating from any employer, because all the money paid in the Valun system under our labor contracts is issued first by the employee, therefore at the end of each tax season, all American A members will get a 1099 from their exchange, since they will be members and have perhaps earned taxable income. That's for THEM to decide. We abide by existing public law as it stands.

Under the proposal, if one is an A member, which means a part owner, and if one is truly indigent, the proposal includes what we have deemed fair to call “natural socialism” and as supported by E. C. Riegel, the only ones capable of issuing money are those without any. They will not be without any for long, unless they are perhaps on their way out through natural causes; we all face eventual demise. Since the proposed Valun shall be a unit of value, stores of them will be inheritable. Every A member will designate their heirs when they join. Members can change these as they wish.

To those out there who may claim the Valun can't have any eventual value, it's very simple. By the proposed rules, a Valun is a fixed piece of purchasing power and we only trade gold or silver for any of them and we decide how much each day based in THEIR prices for precious metals that fixed piece of purchasing power is worth in THEIR money; chiefly dollars and gold. There's no way to break it. There's no way to speculate against it. If THEY cause gold to surge past our initial inception price, we just raise our piece of purchasing power higher, never lower, and when the price backs down, it then costs more in precious metals to purchase that new standard. Purchasing power is preserved and the resulting money gets heavier and heavier which means prices stay nearly constant over long periods of time as people have more confidence in planning business using Valuns. But it will take a lot of people recognizing that this is the unique and only realistic way out from under THEM and on to better things, like fixing the natural disasters THEY have caused. Best we get started as we don't have much time!]


Wednesday, April 26, 2017

#0: Meet Goldman Sachs, the Vampire Squid - James Corbett

Meet Goldman Sachs, the Vampire Squid - James Corbett

Placed here for more education. What one comes away with is something like that these people have a "huge franchise on the world capital markets" and they represent the US dollar and any number of other currencies, which are just brands of THEIR (globalist, banker, elite, pedophile, satanist, etc.) money, not yours or mine, though the general opinion is that since it is in your wallet or at least in your bank account that it is really yours. If that's true just go try and withdraw a large amount into cash. Right: it's not your money. That's why this blog exists. Money is something we all need. We need it on our own terms, not THEIRS. We can't expect anything from THEM as things are working pretty damn well for THEM. We have to consider what we WILL do. Note also the connection between this particular bank and the CIA. We also note in passing that bitcoin has been discussed on line as the preferred method of transacting business for the world's human trafficking networks. Stay away from it! It's just more of THEIR money and someone else can throw a switch and whatever bitcoin you have is no more. It isn't yours and it will never be yours. Understood yet? This is a serious matter. Consider it and then offer some feedback and some resolution to help.

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

#0: Early Morning Thoughts - John Southerland

Let’s imagine for a minute that we are inside a prison. It’s not a bad prison, and in fact, this prison is called Camp Snoopy by many – what could be more benign than that, eh. But we are there for a drug related offense, and we have to stay there. We sleep in a barracks type of sleeping quarters with no privacy, and we get 3 meals a day. We can call out to family and friends, but our telephone calls are monitored and recorded. We are even able to walk around the facility, and we can find books to read. But our personal property is locked away in lockers, and we get no choice of what we eat in the cafeteria. In fact, we have no idea what is being put into our food and water. When we want to do something, we fill out a chit and ask the jailers for permission. We are not allowed to protect ourselves from others, and in fact, if we get into any sort of fight, we are punished. People can come and visit us, but they need to pass inspection of the jailers. If we want, we can request menial jobs in the jail to help pass the time away. We get paid a small amount of money for our work. If we are good prisoners, we can get our sentence reduced for good behavior. But, after serving this prison sentence, we now have a prison record. Finding work in the future will be difficult, and that may push us down into a life of crime. And in the eyes of our friends and relatives, we are no longer good people.

So, the question for today is - what is the difference between this life in prison and life in modern America? In America, we can’t come or go without government permission (passport and state ID). We can’t work without government permission (social security number). We have no choice in our foods (government supports GMO foods). We sleep in houses that are not ours to own – everything belongs to government. We can’t travel by car without government permission (driver’s license, car registration). We can’t change our prison guards – they work for government and are unelected. We can’t choose the money system we want to use, that is controlled by the shadow government. If we break ‘laws’ while traveling (e.g. traveling too fast, or not paying off government by way of taxes), we are punished. We have no privacy, no matter how we try to communicate with others – everything is wiretapped. We can’t defend ourselves against others, especially government police who are able to kill us for any reason. We can’t criticize the criminals inside government or we will be punished.


Some of the points I raised may be discussed, and I could be flat out wrong in my analogy, but I don’t think so. It is my opinion that we live in a giant open air plantation system of totalitarian government. Non-producing government employees (plantation masters) almost outnumber those in the private sector (plantation slaves), and they are above the people in status. Whereas the people in government can kill or imprison us, the private sector can’t do that to the people in government, even when deserved.

This is an unbalanced system we have in America, and it has been unbalanced for a long time – ever since 1913 when the federal government and the American economy was turned over to the private bankers by those in government who allegedly represented us. Today the American system of government and banker control over us is so big, so evolved, so criminal, and so well tuned that it is questionable whether the system can be saved, or whether the people, now drugged out by the plantation masters, will have to revolt against their slavery to government. Maybe it’s time to shut down this government completely.

And that raises other questions about government. Is government always bad for the people? Should any form of government ever be kept in place for a period of time longer than 25 years? Does each generation have the right to have its own form of government? Does a two class society (like ours) always require the force and violence of government to ensure its survival? Does government always grow in size? And, as an aside, why does government have deep underground bunkers for its survival and protection while the people do not have that same underground protection mechanism? Why should the sacred cows in government be protected while the people perish? Is there any way to prevent sociopaths from achieving power and control over others?
 

Is there anyone left who is proud of America and its Zionist controlled government? Inquiring minds want to know.

John Southerland

[oh and this excellent example of the social prose of our time also showed up today:]

They [the common people] WANT TO BELIEVE but nothing they believe is TRUE nor can they discern truth because it proves everything they believe to be a LIE and then they could no longer BELIEVE.
 

Any form of ENLIGHTENMENT can be nothing more than the crumbling away of BELIEF in the face or TRUTH established by reason, fact and evidence.

NATURAL LIBERTY / NATURAL LAW are based on PROVABLE FACT / OBJECTIVE TRUTH which require NO BELIEF. FRAUD, TYRANNY and EXTORTION are based on LIES which can only exist for as long as there are those STUPID ENOUGH to BELIEVE IN THEM. 

 
Hence we have two completely different and separate SPECIES of humanity which exist as diametrically opposed ENEMIES and have absolutely NOTHING in common with each other. One existing in the pursuit of KNOWLEDGE and HUMAN PROGRESS and the other existing as a VIRUS unto this earth, a VIRUS unto US and a VIRUS unto THEMSELVES however their BELIEFS keep them too IGNORANT, STUPID and MORALLY BANKRUPT to RECOGNIZE THIS.

Neither have they [the VIRUS group] the right to VIOLATE the NATURAL LIBERTY or ability to function of EVEN ONE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL with their IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, BELIEFS, OPINIONS, GREED and ENVY no matter how many of them there are and EVERY SINGLE HUMAN INSTITUTION from Organized Religion to Political Philosophies exists to enable these STUPID SHEEP and PIGEONS, this HUMAN VIRUS, to FLOCK TOGETHER under the leadership of PSYCHOPATHS in order to enable them to DO JUST THAT.

it is TIME to TURN THE TABLES.

David Brown


[Again, we post these as examples of current expressions of discontent.  Oh, and one more thing; "turning the tables" is exactly what Jesus did.  The times we're in are similar.  Except that this blog's proposal prefers simply having our own machine and institutions and ultimately walking out on THEM.  Understood?]

Friday, April 21, 2017

#0: BANKSTERS PAPER SILVER & GOLD RAIDS LOSING POWER


Basic education.  A lot of it here.  If they read this blog, they will understand further how far we have all been led astray.  Gold and silver (and bitcoin, recently revealed to be the favored payment method for all human trafficking worldwide) is THEIR money, not yours or mine.  To the extent that anyone relies on money that they did not personally issue, the further along the road to absolute slavery will they follow.  This blog offers the only serious alternative and of course I have yet to hear from anyone seriously considering it.  I'm beginning to feel like Noah before the flood.  Seriously.

Be seeing you  

Oh, and one more thing.  These people have the best arguments for exactly why precious metals are still THEIR money, not yours or mine.  Read this blog and see what we consider the only monetary use for gold and silver in a real honest money system, NOT one spawned by the usual senseless and beside the point sophistries of the usual economists, no thanks.  Read this blog and then decide.    

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

#57.9 Perspective - Getting There

(Written on 4/10/17) This happens to be a weird sort of personal anniversary. It was on April 10, 1977, exactly 40 years ago, that I set out on a bus from San Francisco to Boston and New York, a journey that was to decide the direction my life would take from there on out. I was born, raised and educated in Northern California and I desperately wanted to get out and go east and see the world. What was very odd about it was that New York in particular should exert such a hold on me, almost as though I had actually lived there before or needed to belong there for some reason. Manhattan began to seem about as familiar as though it had always been my home town. I was more than proud of being able to tell out of towners how to get someplace. There were many reasons I suppose, for being in New York in the eighties and then in Atlanta in the nineties and of course to have returned to upstate New York rather than returning to California, by then mostly abandoned by my family for parts north and east. Being here in the Northeast was, among other things, for me to pursue the course set by my father to learn more about and understand money.

We have used the analogy of the Titanic to describe the present disorder with its DECEPTIVE democratic republican front, rule by babblers, by the worst possible types of people, which the government machine selects due to its very design. By the way, back when the Church (in the West the RC and in mother Russia and parts east, the Orthodox), that particular reigning machine of the times likewise tended to select and promote the very worst sorts of characters to DARE to claim the right to rule over the rest of us, the stupid and unwashed of the world. We'll stick to our proposition that all human institutions and organizations are essentially social machines complete with inputs, outputs and procedures and of course, since THEIR money is always involved, the kick-back to people making money on money without work is always present.

You know, just here, how about a nice slap across the face to every last so called “social justice warrior” out there: you are a bunch of ignorant fools who haven't the slightest idea of what you assume you know and think about anything! Mostly you are traitors to yourselves first and foremost. Honestly if you feel so bad about yourselves, the rest of us, the way things are, perhaps you might as well … just go off somewhere and die quietly so as not to upset the lives of THEM (globalists, BANKERS, elites of all kinds, PEDOPHILES: people who rape, kill and eat children! and Luciferians: people who assume they are the “enlightened light bearers” to the rest of society, etc.). With THEM is the contract you have all unwittingly signed onto apparently before any of you were born and they have your birth certificates as “assets” to attempt to prove something that could only be by FORCE thereby overthrowing the worldwide programming that attempts to convince us that all the democratic republican front is really of our making and supports us. Those of you who have taken THEIR money to foment civil strife are guilty of even greater crimes.

Increasingly we see social disintegration that is deliberately promoted by a gang of super rich thugs. Has anyone bothered to ask how THEY got their money? THEY STOLE IT. So what are you going to do about it, little man and little woman? It was always THEIR money to begin with, even silver and gold. So this is just one more thing you have been stupid about all your life. Does that mean that money per se is an evil device? Anyone who thinks so is either deceived or a deceiver and we have seen both. No, money is just a human invention, like the wheel or running water. But all money anyone knows of is THEIRS and so is THEIR machine and THEIR brand of it that is at fault. In fact, more than ever before, we need to start seriously thinking about developing our own use of this time and energy saving invention and with it our own social machine to support it.

Social trends around us are suggesting going very small or bugging out of society altogether. This is the DIRECT result of too much debt. We said in numerous papers that mountains of debt is the cancer that eventually kills economies and with the destruction of economies, standards of living and future fulfillment of all legitimate human aspirations begin to fall.

The ideas of abundance and perpetual security are fading away as everyone scrambles to be doing less with less, deciding to accede to the infringing of their very lives and futures, for whose benefit? The earth? Earth abides whether we do or do not. So for whose benefit? The holders of debt. So the cancer analogy is apt; just as cancer usually kills its victims by starvation, so too does excessive debt kill economies.

We see a landscape of nearly abandoned relics of old villages and towns, mostly in need of paint and repair, but who cares? It would only mean higher taxes and where's the money to buy paint when you have to pay taxes and pay off debt? Besides, you see they are all abandoned, so who comes to them anymore? What economic use do any of them serve? Perhaps it would have been better to demolish most of them twenty years ago. You know what? The globalists certainly think so too. You can find out more of what THEY intend as THEY have written it elsewhere.

We also see the social machines that replaced the old village and town centers populated with real mom and pop businesses that represented real wealth because all of it provided an income. The destroyers of all that wealth in turn built the huge well lit, open 24/7, temples of commerce surrounded by many acres of parking lot. Look at the parking lots, mostly empty or emptier now than usual and inside the stores fewer people too. Imagine going to a large store just to get away from most people. So far, full shelves and low enough prices, but less and less money and THEY want to do away with cash and call the cops when you pull out too much money from one of their machines or transfer it somewhere else. So whose money is it anyway? It is the first and most important question for you to answer.

We see that everything comes from somewhere else rather than where we are and nobody gets that while in the past people dealt with their neighbors and got attentive service, these days one is apparently happy to pad around some huge warehouse on concrete slabs all day where the people waiting on you came from somewhere around the world and so do the products.

We can't tell, but we don't believe that one is likely to find Wal-Marts, Targets, etc. in China manned by Arabs, Africans or Mexicans. We ask ourselves why all of this is necessary? Does any of it actually benefit Arabs, Africans or Mexicans, or for that matter Chinese, Europeans or Americans very much? Who then does all of this momentum to monopolize all markets benefit? Who must be paid before everyone else? Governments. Why? Bankers demand it. Whose money is it? Are you getting it yet?

Honestly, this blog is not about any of that, its proposal is in fact a way to get away from all of that, because as can be ascertained through data documented elsewhere, not exclusively on this blog, THEIR system cannot last forever and will not accomplish its goal of worldwide domination. It is unnatural to expect anything else but disaster for the present order / disorder. THEY (globalists, BANKERS, elites, pederasts, Luciferians, scribes, Pharisees, pundits, experts, technocrats, etc.) will not succeed at taking over the world because THEIR “big useless plans” defy Nature. They are once again flouting the law of diminishing returns to scale and shall pass away (go extinct) just like the dinosaur – and THEIR “public” corporations will as well.

For instance, and we hate to be obvious about it, but we will insolently point it out anyway: THEY are said (and written and heard) to favor “diversity” whether that's racial, cultural, ethnic, however. If all are the same in every regard, then there aint no diversity now, is there? I suppose it makes little difference to point out that such globalist objectives show complete disrespect for real natural diversity; it isn't about what each of the people want it is what THEY want for “the masses.” THEY want all of us to be hooked onto ideas of “fairness” or “equality” or “community” (It Takes a Village, etc.) and tell me, just who is it that decides for everyone else? It certainly aint you, that's for sure, pal.

Why are you necessarily supposed to go along with any of it? That's just how people get themselves into wars. That too is not a subject this blog is directly about, accept to say that of course the “military-industrial complex” which along with banking in all its present forms, goes straight back to good old ancient Babylon (see David Astle), ruled by a bureaucratic cadre of scribes (technocrats) who were in turn the fronts for the few at the top that claimed to own everyone and everything in sight; the Lucifierians (enlightened bearers of light) of their own times. 

So according to recent financial reports, if THEY apparently need THEIR money more than you do, in order to try and keep THEIR frauds alive, what do you need? You wont be able to decide a thing without determining your own value to yourself and just how you intend on making that wonderful innate wealth of yours shine forth to others so that you can trade what you have for what you want.

If you live in a dingy village only because people don't want to pay for repainting it, cleaning it up, etc. then the Valun Labour Contract enables anyone to do what needs to be done, to be paid in one's own money generated from the will (FIAT) of those who backed it with their own labor. Oh, there may be a few dollars into it too, after all there are taxes to be paid in THEIR money, but the local economy, those who grow things locally, provide services locally, etc. would benefit as long as there were a sufficient (say 10%) of the value in “public” money to settle taxes, into the work done. “I'll do it for 5 and 3” might become common, meaning five Valuns and $3 per hour worked. Five Valuns is usually between $12 and $15. Right now at $2.75 five Valuns is $13.75 (4/10/17).

Like it or not, people are attracted to doing business in areas that look clean and well looked after, so there is always need of this kind of work. Much of the work to do this upkeep is not paid at present. A Valun system would help correct this and improve everyone's lives accordingly.

Since all money is evidence of debt, what one is doing by working and issuing one's own money for it, is backing a debt of time out of the rest of your life or work. This debt instrument, in our case a V-Check, allows the holder to transfer the funds at the local exchange described to their own account in trade for a good or service provided in their community. 

This movement of value measurement through a community is what is known as economy or co-money, the movement of money with the associated transfer of goods and services providing the basis for … civilization. All of the apparent and not so apparent values are added to end products that come to us in streams of abundance, because everyone really is capable of finding and developing their innate wealth, always producing an income, under a Valun based system far more than under the present system.

And who do you contact when THEIR system fails and all of THEIR money is gone or unavailable to you? None of THEM will help you with anything except onto a bus to one of their “camps.” You really do need to get out and meet more people, we all do. We need to know who lives around us, and more importantly work together for our own local common benefit. It's really the only way forward. We literally have to keep out of THEIR way until THEY fail. We have to decide what will make our villages LIVE again. We have to decide who and for what anyone would venture into them and what business they would expect to do in each village. Same for towns, sections of cities, areas of vast countryside, each area has its own innate commonwealth potential. We look forward to a time of local prosperity, no poverty, a real human potential movement, deciding what we will do and how we will live, etc. the return of free PRIVATE enterprise and PRIVATE property, the re-invigoration of natural social institutions; families, extended families, clans, nations, etc.


[4/12/17: You know, Mr. Burton, for any of this to work out well, we are all going to have to treat each other better. What you're asking us to do is form another private organization that duplicates functions but belongs to us. It is democratic rather than autocratic, even with your board of trustees, with which I agree. But I really think character matters and were we to do this, we would have to insist on people who are widely known to us to be good people, so I guess you are calling as many good people together as you can. It will take people who are the best, who really care about the future, who see through all the lies and bullshit. Beth in Kansas

Thank-you! 

There was something else that I meant to say in this post and it concerned the rich (those with personal net assets of at least $100 million). I suspect that doesn't represent that many people. You see those who have been successful in this economy but are not that rich, certainly understand the personal risk and the opportunities taken to achieve their social position relative to the rest of us. The problem is one of altitude; those with more of THEIR money see everyone else from a more elevated position and then things get distorted.

It's great to know of “toxic internationalism” and all that but at the end of the day, it's each one of our lives that matters, where we are and who we are and who those around us really are, etc. One primary reason for having our own money is to return value to ourselves where we are and take it away from THEM (as previously identified).]

#0: David Icke - Point of No Return

David Icke - Point of No Return

There are matters referenced indicating this podcast came from before the 2016 election and perhaps before Brexit in June of 2016.  Now it didn't, it just seems like it.  Nevertheless the information is still relevant and the processes Icke discusses are still underway despite whatever apparent changes have occurred, simply because of all the matters we have discussed concerning THEIR money, not yours or mine. It IS the fundamental reason behind every real evil in the world. Sill think this blog's proposal isn't important? What will it take? Are you still working for them for THEIR money? OK, have a nice life. But you're still nothing but one of THEIR free range slaves. Ever wonder why things are STILL not right anywhere in the Western world and getting worse everywhere else? It has EVERYTHING to do with money. It's time to wake up, wise up and get a real education.
 
 
Be seeing you

Friday, April 7, 2017

#0: Daily News Segment - CTM #719 - With John B Wells

Daily News Segment - CTM #719 - With John B Wells

A kind of watershed news broadcast that certainly describes things that are congruent with this blog's criticism of the present disorder.  

Thursday, April 6, 2017

#57.8 Perspective - Money and Contracts

Those who have followed along this far have already read all the previous numbered (above #0 news) papers and understand the proposal. For instance, fewer than we would like have read #84.

Those advocating some limited supply of some commodity as money are actually advocating economic suffocation and THEIR counter price inflation explanations are also erroneous because all money dies in depreciation. We buy all THEIR junk economics because THEY run the show … until THEY no longer do. This blog is not about what THEY do, have done or are doing. It is about you and what you and those immediately around you are doing.

Briefly again, the proposal is to establish our own monetary accounting machine, institutions to support it, money that issues from us not THEM (globalists, bankers, elites, pedophiles, satanists, etc. you are what you are by association). Ours is to overlay any and all natural human society and run parallel to THEIR machine, so that when THEIRS finally fails, we can then have things our way. Understood? You want your freedom? Where is your money? Without that, you are a slave; THEIR slave. This proposal is not a secret society, but it is private. It is based on the simple natural law of contracts between people that was before, is today and will be after any state. So we begin with the road to freedom being paved with all kinds of explicit and implicit contracts and that among them is the right to ORGANIZE by association our own monetary union apart from THEIRS.  

So this blog is not primarily about THEM or THEIR machines. You can find out plenty of relevant information by following a few of the sources listed down the right side of this page under NEWS sources. THEY are the present disintegrating order, the final disgusting beast imperium that rules the world at the present moment. This blog is not about any of that either. It assumes that you know about all of that already. That's what being aware and awake amounts to. You already know that we are ruled by the basest of men (and a few of the worst possible women) and that the entire rotten system is all rigged to support the few at the top. This blog isn't about THEM, it's about us and how we deal with each other day to day, year in and year out and how we will have our will matched with our claimed desires for freedom represented by our own money.

In the United States, this proposal is understood as included within the 1st Amendment to the Constitution (which THEY hate and even today, always attempt to break, have indeed already long since before we were all born broken, but which is also not what this blog is about).
 
Each one of us has the NATURAL (not CIVIL) right to contract with another except for that which the state regards as criminal activity. If THEY say that THEY have a monopoly over all contracts dealing in money, then you live under a tyranny that deliberately blocks your right to contract. Riegel said just that. There are a few states where laws exist that would prevent any of our proposal from moving forward easily. Again, exposure of THEIR criminal and unlawful behavior is the best weapon we have. The more people that become ACTIVE, aware and awake to the reality that this so called representative democracy we live under is just in place to protect the “special” interests, then it will be recognized more widely that politics is nothing more than a public show to hide THEIR out and out tyranny.
 
There is indeed much in law concerning such matters that also needs to be repealed and TORN OUT OF ALL THE LAW BOOKS and never regarded again, as they are deliberate attempts to break the 1st Amendment, and by same amendment, I have the right to say, think and write such anywhere in public view, where it can be freely discussed, debated, etc. Hey, if you really care about unmasking the tyranny in democratic republican garb that we live under, try forming an alliance that is only interested in repealing law not making more of it. Most of us would be happy to join.

Previously, I noted that attorneys would naturally figure pretty broadly throughout our intended machine. We will need protection and the attorneys we seek would naturally see things from a natural law perspective.

All owners have a vote and they vote for the officers of their local exchanges who run for those offices and serve for a term of one year. Behind the elected officers are a board of trustees.

The local boards I have in mind for each exchange are actually like boards of trustees and I'll make it easier by also stating that such as we seek should be completely beyond reproach as well known community leaders; either they own sizable businesses in the area or they manage large estates, are perhaps farmers, etc. the pillars of society. You want on your boards people you can trust, so in fact they would be boards of trustees. These are the men among men, women among women, natural leaders. If you have few people following you around you're probably not a leader. Out of this body would be chosen among themselves rotating positions as officers of the initial bodies (yes, corporations in the same sense) and they would be the usual officers of President, Vice President and Secretary to rotate among themselves for terms of a year up until the first election by the owners which will be signaled by owner membership rising above a specific number of owners. The number of owners above 10,000 might be what is required to set off the democratic process.

Individual membership in our business / monetary machine is called A membership and only A members have voting rights and pay dues. B memberships are for businesses, largely or wholly made up of A members, just as Riegel described it. Only A members can issue money under our proposal, again just as Riegel described it. B members (for profit business organizations) are made up of A members.

Regarding B members, since the business functions in local “public” money already, all that is done is that an overlay is created by each local node, which we call an exchange rather than a bank. Since money is inseparable from accounting and not just represented by the quantity (commodity) of its tokens, each B member account enables each member business to manage its monetary assets in Valuns.

The institutional nodes we call exchanges because we aren't actually in favor of banks, banking, or the present practices of THEIR finance structures. Again, you can find out all you want about THEIR system elsewhere and that is also not what this blog is about.  

Each exchange would be in the business of selling advertising of its member businesses all in “public” money at first (until we have the businesses within our VEN to print our own V-Checks, etc.). These ads would be part of the designs on the reverse sides of our functioning currency, the proposed V-Check. To all our B members, the money they spend on advertising is a legitimate cost of doing business.
 
So this proposed overlay consists of accounts for each member. These accounts will resemble checking accounts, with some added features, as described elsewhere in this blog.
 
The monetary unit used is the proposed international standard Value Unit or Valun, the same name proposed by Riegel. Right now, the proposed Valun is roughly $2.75 (3/28/17). Our money is called a Value Unit or a Valun. Value Units would be referenced in regular conversation as Valuns. Each Valun represents an unchanging unit of purchasing power rather than a unit of a commodity (which is what ALL of THEIR money represents, including bitcoin). One cannot presume an international standard of value / exchange measurement, unless the basis does not change.

A Valun changes its exchange in dollars, gold, etc. based on the present value, in THEIR money of course, of the original, initial transaction which has already happened and established forever (or at least until the price of gold breaches this initial transaction). Then the initial transaction goes up, never down, and the resulting Valun becomes even harder relative to all of THEIR money.

As we said, if you intend on preserving purchasing power in your monetary system, you deliberately build that intention into your system. The proposed Valun is already the heaviest money in the world and will always intentionally be so.  [It was brought to my attention that a few of the Gulf states have heavier currencies so we would be in good company.]   In fact we can roundly say that any investments, savings, etc. in all THEIR money is fatally doomed to suffer inflation, whereas it would be very difficult to break a Valun, once established (since it is never a unit of commodity nor exchanged on that basis, ever)

Each A member is entitled to issue money for any work already paid in any other money, so again a parallel series of contracts is set up at the exchange, which runs parallel to payment in “public” money. At the present, there are income taxes and since Valun issuance through work definitely constitutes income, all money as earned
income within our machine is still subject to taxes based on THEIR money, not ours. Nothing about this proposal is a tax dodge, so if you thought it was, please look elsewhere. A members would be issued 1099's (or equivalent) each year and the “public” money they earn would go to pay these taxes. Taxes are always each member's responsibility.
 
How much extra income would one acquire earning / issuing Valuns? It will ultimately depend on how many people adopt the Valun as their means of exchange for common goods and services first and other more ambitious extensions into finance of larger purchases as actual wealth measured in Valuns grows within each community later.

Income taxes are obviously part of THEIR scam involving THEM acting by stolen fiat to issue “public” money. We can't be complacent about things or argue reality away: illegitimate or not, all this “public” money, including all accounts related to it, is real money; it fulfills the characteristics attributed to money save one, a store of value.
 
Since we maintain that money apart from a commodity basis cannot itself possess value without affecting all sales transactions and price structures, only a commodity basis can store value. But what is the basis of THAT value and who gets to decide it? Do you or I? No. Besides which we contend that you can have either a stable measure of value or a store of value, but not both. Our little experiment since 2011 has demonstrated that gold and silver prices are NOT stable, in dollars or anything else. If the basis of your money is incapable of maintaining steady prices, then it is insufficient as a measure of value; this would be like using a ruler with different measures on it each day while your are building a project, house or business.  
 
If you work for a business / organization / institution / machine that does not have a B membership in your local Valun exchange, you can still get a contract with the rest of the members of your exchange to earn and issue Valuns.

Let's say you work for a public water department and you live within the service area of the exchange. The water department is part of a public institution, a government, and therefore is at present disqualified as a B member (We predict, as did Riegel, without having to say so directly, that governments are more likely to become eventual exchange members than any “public” corporations). However, individuals that work there are permitted A membership. All that is necessary is for a regular pay stub to be presented and a Labour (British English spelling) Contract is drawn up on one page that describes the expected pay dates when Valuns will be issued and paid. The number of Valuns selected will have some reference to expected taxes as an upward limit.  

But there is another and it is another use of our 80% rule. In any job, you are earning “public” money and some of that is withheld for taxes. We're only interested in the take home pay. That would be your 100% base pay and so the number of Valuns you'd be allowed to issue would be up to 80% of the value in “public” money represented by that base pay. Example: if your take home, after tax pay is $100 a week, then depending on the dates on the Labour Contract, the dollar value of Valuns that day would be no more than $80 per week.
 
Perhaps at first the number of Valuns such would prefer earning alongside their “public” money would be smaller than they would be willing to pay themselves for their work in excess of the purchasing power represented by pay in “public” money. Later, as experience and familiarity grows, more Valuns will be earned / issued in this way. That's one reason for beginning with Labour Contracts of no longer than six months. Each contract can be adjusted differently.

Oh, and who issues the Labour Contract? Why, you do. It's part of the self-financing of all labor throughout our system. You, as the A member of your exchange, having some public job at a water department, have the right to issue your labor to your community for as many Valuns as you can pay the income taxes on up to 80% of your base pay. You are offering the community to continue working and thereby earning extra purchasing power (besides your “public” money) that you agree to spend and receive among the other members of any exchange using Valuns, anywhere Valuns are recognized and received, but primarily locally among other exchange members.

Likewise, should you be an A member working for a company (a public corporation) which cannot be a B member, you can issue a Labour Contract for additional Valuns paid to you on the dates you would normally be paid in “public” money, again up to the 80% rule.

We described what happens in Labour Contracts at #78.and #79. 
 
To those who continually pressure for minimum wages in “public” money, this proposal is our answer. One reason E. C. Riegel got interested in this whole alternative money thing was his contention (shared by us) is that common labor of all kinds is universally underpaid. Nobody except those who do not work, but live from making money on money without actually sacrificing any time out of the rest of their lives, the capitalists, only THEY ever make money in the present system / machine. The present machine, we should and can easily see, is either incapable of or unwilling to, pay anyone more than they are currently being paid. This illustrates the fundamental ineligibility of all THEIR economic explanations. THEY extol usury, rigorously defined as the demand back of that which was never issued, which is stealing and of fractional reserve banking schemes, lending money one doesn't have, which is fraud. To hell with THEIR economics of apologetics for THEIR corrupt machine! Some of this blog constitutes an informed refutation of a few of THEIR ideas, but frankly we're not even that interested. Most of us have come with armed minds and baloney detectors. The more we know, the less we'd like even knowing them.

This blog is not about THEM or THEIR economic explanations for anything.

What can be salvaged for a new economics? We'll start with supply and demand and location and appreciate our own means of exchange, which shall be understood at each community level and eventually throughout the Valun trading communities worldwide. We do expect that over all costs of labor will rise, but will be covered by Valun acceptance and that costs for all products in Valuns will be lower and more stable.

But here's where we make it personal: if you do work (time taken out of the rest of your life) for a family member and you aren't getting paid for it, then your value is being causally exchanged, which does not diminish its value, but indicates that the worker does not reap any direct material benefit for their work; they have given their time or material products as gifts. The best things in life certainly ARE free and not determinable in money, but that does not dismiss the acknowledgment that a lot of labor goes unpaid, especially within our most important natural social units, extended families. What then? Do we demand that some state pay for it out of “public” money? Why? That strategy gives more power to those who have already abused it and anyway the basis for all of THEIR money is without basis. Contemplate if you will the other papers we have linked in this post.

An example would be two sisters, the elder with children, the younger without. The older needs the younger to watch her children while she works. Rather than pay her in dollars, pay her in Valuns. Hundreds of simple jobs would work this way under the proposal.

The entire market where Valuns are traded and accepted as the means of exchange we called a Valun Exchange Network or VEN, but then discovered someone had already called another bitcoin like commodity based money a VEN. So it goes.

David Burton 

[4/11/17: Q: I'd appreciate it if you could outline all the contracts a member would be subject to for joining an exchange. Owen, IA

A: Each member has a Membership Contract with their local exchange. Individual A members / owners of each exchange agree to pay a yearly dues of V1 (one Value Unit or Valun) in “public” money. Right now that would be $2.76 per year. The exchange opens an account similar to a checking account for the member with an opening issuance balance of V200 (two hundred Valuns). 

Each B member business gets an account and does not have to pay dues. We encourage all legitimate private businesses to join with as little cost as possible. It is expected that at least some of these businesses will be buying advertising from the exchange in local “public” money that will appear on the reverse sides of our circulating currency, the V-Check.

Movement of Value Units (Valuns) between accounts constitutes a transaction. We regard a transaction as between an issuer/buyer and a receiver/seller: the buyer is paying Valuns to the seller. Each exchange will charge a fee of one tenth of one percent (.01%) to the buyer. This means that it takes V1 to move V1,000 from one account to another and the least one pays is V.01 (one cend or one fen) to move V10 (ten Valuns) or less. 

The other function of each exchange is as a private meeting place where each member gets to advertise for goods or services available in Valuns. It will be at the level of bulletin boards rather than the internet, although websites for each exchange that perform this service are bound to spring up. As we all know, information is everything and we will want to know what jobs are available and how to apply, etc. One might see jobs offered in combinations of Valuns and “public” money. Examples of values might be in the range of 5 to 2 or 10 to 1. 

For instance, I would be perfectly happy to sell most of my services in my chosen discipline for V5 + $2 an hour. It works out to around $15 / hr. Other jobs would prefer V10 + $5 which would be more like $32 / hr. This would be all in line with exactly what E. C. Riegel would have liked to see develop. His only problem was implementation. 

(4/11/17) We assume that many, most, all of the businesses that become B members buy ads from the exchange which show on the reverse sides of our money, the circulating V-Checks. They buy this advertising from us in “public” money and take the money they spend off their taxes as a legitimate business expense. 

We expect all exchanges to print and circulate V-Checks in the following denominations: V½ at about $1.38, V1 at $2.73, V2 at $5.46, V5 at $13.66, and eventually the rest, V10 at $27.31, V20 at $54.62, V50 at $136.55 and V100 at $1,365.50 ! We have already seen laws that indicate nothing of less value than $1 can be circulated as alternative money and there may be rules concerning the circulation of anything above a certain dollar amount. For the time being, coinage is the unique province of the state. Although E. C. Riegel had some ideas about coins and we entertained them and even though small round shallow cylinders of metal of various sizes is an impressive invention by itself, we can just as well accomplish a lot by using good 80 lb paper and making our money look as attractive as it needs to be to convey its message: the bearer of this V-Check herewith tenders whatever number of Valuns (international standard Value Units) in exchange for whatever product or service is offered for sale in them. 

V-Checks have six month expiration dates like regular checks and like coupons, but even if expired they can be exchanged for new V-Checks with new expiration dates or deposited into an account.]

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

#0: Paul Craig Roberts - New World Order Explained 2017

Paul Craig Roberts - New World Order Explained 2017

We have reason to believe that this interview took place many months prior and was re-published.  Just because Trump scrubbed it does not mean it is dead.  What Roberts informs you of is that unless you are one of THEM (globalists, etc.) and have plenty of THEIR money ... then you basically have no rights and no future.  That's why this blog exists.  That's why this blog's proposal is so important.  How much has conditioning worked?  Pretty damn well.  It even has many who have tried climbing the increasingly slippery ladder to have given up the climb.  Just as well, since the whole damn thing was rigged from the outset.  But exposure is underway.  Even so, the governments are at the mercy of corporations and the banks and THEIR money behind it all.  Commerce in anything like bitcoin?  That's just some more of THEIR money.  Bags of gold and silver coins?  More of THEIR money.  How about you yourself?  What are you worth?  Read this blog and understand the proposal and then ask yourself again.  Also take note, ALL governments are THEIR slaves.  So is every single last political party on the face of the democratic earth.  Expect nothing good for you from them as they are enslaved as well.

Be seeing you