Sunday, January 29, 2017

#0: Climate Engineering Cataclysm: A Live Presentation By Dane Wigington

Climate Engineering Cataclysm: A Live Presentation By Dane Wigington ( GeoengineeringWatch.org )

How much time do we have left to turn this around? Are we already too late?  Obviously we are going to be dealing with this one way or another; its consequences and aftermath.  Those who really see connections will understand how our proposal (THIS blog's proposal) is related to all the other ways the message is "come out of her, my people."  

Saturday, January 28, 2017

#0: Demonetization and You - James Corbett


You will notice that the paper notes becomes worthless because they lose their "legal tender" status.  Now on what does that depend?  It depends on the use of that money as a means of payment determined by FORCE of some state.  What do we say?  The music stops when either one of two things happens, either one refuses to take whatever money is offered or one will refuse to work for whatever money is offered.  The reason THEY (globalist, banker, elite) want to get rid of cash is because THEY seek absolute control.  THEY want to identify EVERY transaction involving THEIR money.  Are we going to live with this?  Are we assuming that things this complex will succeed?  Why?  If they fail, and it is not if but when, then perhaps hundreds of millions will starve.  Is that what THEY may want anyway?  We've already told you many times so far.  YOU and I will ultimately need OUR OWN cash or we will NOT have ANY individual or even group freedom of choice for anything.  THIS maneuver is strictly and solely a benefit to THEM, not you or I.   

Be seeing you .

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

#0: A Map of THEM

Intelligence analysis frequently uses charts like this. I can't even tell you the number of charts of this kind I have seen and helped construct over the years, yes for clients, and this one is a particularly good one for showing connections to one of the great deliberate FORCES of ... elites taking over the world. OK?  Sure: copy it and spread it far and wide and if you're of a mind to, study the institutions and people identified.  You'll have a much clearer view of reality for your efforts.

Since THEIR money is what everyone uses, THEY get what THEY want and get most of us as "useful idiots" to work for THEIR money which THEY convince us is actually ours. Fools! That's what THEY think of you behind your backs. Understood yet?

OH and BTW, see that school of economics at the lower left? That's where Trump went. You have to be above smart to get into that place. Anyone who imagines that Trump is not connected or doesn't know things or is some kind of fool is ... well just go look in the mirror and see the fool THEY think of you anyway. Don't believe what some CULT channel of the dispossessed Left has to say. If you're comfortable with THEIR lies and fibs CNN and NPR I NEVER bother with, that's your personal problem. Truth is elsewhere. 

Be seeing you

Saturday, January 21, 2017

#0: The Central Bankers Are Going To Shutoff The Spicket



Yes, they misspelled spigot.  We left it as is.  The analysis of the current system is excellent as usual. Smith neglected to mention that the interest demanded by the central banks was from money which was never created. It's one thing to issue money from nothing. It's another to insist that one pays back from what was NOT created. THAT as we have consistently maintained is the cancer in the form of mountains of unpayable debt which eventually destroys host economies and topples governments. But Smith also discusses two things which are also not consistent with reality; continual growth of enterprise in terms of actual scale and robotics and AI technology. If there is no money available in whatever form, then who buys anything? AI and robotics? Who needs them? They will become about as useful as poetry. Just because some widget heads in Palo Alto develop it doesn't mean the world will automatically accept it.

The real issues concern the uses of common words. If they are misused or issues such as the limit to growth of business enterprises are ignored, then one eventually experiences catastrophe. Smith's analysis of the fate of universal welfare is also spot on, but not for the reasons he supposes. It is entirely due to STOLEN fiat and STOLEN responsibility. Stolen fiat is the crime of all banking and stolen responsibility the crime of all states.

The fiat and responsibility belongs with each of us from the ground up, not the top down. That way the money is OURS and is issued by US not THEM. Entirely that and the elimination of usury, the demand of a return of that which was never created in the first place; in common parlance, stealing! Capitalism, limited to making money on money that already exists rather than on demanding back what never existed would be a necessary improvement; you want to borrow someone's money, you pay the cost of renting that money up front from already existing money, the result being that you in fact borrow less money. It seems simple but it makes all the difference in the world.

We would also do ourselves a favor by limiting the ability to borrow money to 80% of projected income. Then, fewer people would borrow excessive amounts of money and there would be fewer bankruptcies.

But I've also laid bare the actual situation: work is the time anyone takes out of their lives to earn barter in terms of money. Work is an expression of one's innate wealth, and ALL wealth must produce income or it is just stuff which may and probably will depreciate so it loses money over time. Anything losing value over time proves that money itself is a naturally perishable commodity; over time if nobody does anything, there is less and less available money. Now if debts create mountains and can not be paid off then what are they actually worth? Getting it?

The reason to ban cash is to further control, to prop up the new goods markets and destroy the value of all used goods, to eliminate the lower rungs of an economy while keeping the upper ones going, etc. It's all doomed. Why? Perception. ALL WEALTH MUST GENERATE INCOME OR IT IS NOT WEALTH. If you or I do not generate wealth FROM OURSELVES then eventually everything fails. If there are too many regulations, and too many people employed as regulators, then what say we of their roles in society? We'd say they are clearly parasites as are all the bankers who demand back what was not created.

So if you automate or do something to take someone's real job away, what you have done is to DESTROY WEALTH. Understood? ALL income destruction is the destruction of wealth. Any enterprise may be enlarged up to the point where its ability to function profitably is eventually overtaken by the expenses to keep it all going, the diminishing returns to scale law which is a real natural law and cannot be evaded. This means that redundancy in production is necessary and natural and all centralization and standardization beyond a certain size is not natural. You fly against nature only so long and you crash. All the big monstrosities that have been built over the last 50 years are dinosaurs and will need to be dismantled and torn down.

So, I think I've said plenty for now except to underline once more the necessary apolitical position this news puts anyone in who sees things clearly; no matter how brilliant, anointed, wished for, etc. some particular people are in positions of prestige, leadership and power on the political stage, is in really just more indications of the same; stolen fiat and responsibility from each and every one of us. Digital technologies? We could and did live without them and getting back to paper ballots and yes, paper money and paper checks (sorry) is the sure way forward. Really liked the ancient Rome analogy as though we were asked what we are doing with the rest of our lives except watching circuses on TV while we stuff our faces with plenty of government issued GMO bread and getting fat and lazy and dying young. We need to start redirecting our lives toward what we can and will do to earn our own money that we issue ourselves, not from any government or bank. Period!

Oh and since money is a resource that requires replenishment or economies die, the more people who actually work at things (and generate money thereby), the better off they will be and their families and communities and nations and countries with them. Governments will have to get smaller then because all the real money will be ours and we will decide whether to lend it to them based on our ability to handle the debt burden of taxes that result.   


Best .

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

#57.5: Perspective - People to people

Since this is a “perspective” piece, expect that some of it is going to allow me to rant. Some are no doubt under the impression that everything I say on here amounts to ranting, but that's only because they (those that suppose that all I do is rant) stubbornly stick to ideas which aren't even theirs, which they THOUGHTLESSLY (without critical examination) accepted and now expect me or anyone else offering an alternative to the present mess to compromise with. But there are no compromises: this is a quiet war that has been going on for … 7,500 years and all the evil in the world is really due to compromise … with evil. No, and emphatically no. We seek commitment not compromise; strength not weakness, will rather than acquiescence. This one could be subtitled, setting a basis for a grass-roots movement. 

Come on. How do you talk anyone into accepting your money proposal? All the philosophy and whatever behind it may be as sound as you say, but it's as if only you are selling this as your idea. No one I know of bases money on a fixed transaction, they all use commodities. Eli in Washington

Dave's dollars? No, it isn't my idea. The name on this blog is not mine. I'm merely the messenger, as usual. But the short answer is that “the one eyed man is king in the world of the blind.” Stated another way, “if you have the time, we have the plan;” if you can think and plan over spans of hundreds of years if necessary to blind everyone in society, while at the same time, you are the only one knowing what's really going on, that gives you a lot of power and money and prestige and property and advantages, etc. Let's see: how many of you ever heard of morganatic relationships? Your further research may start right there. Look into it. It's far more common than you can even imagine.

THEY, we sort of suggest, are the combined groupings of globalists, bankers and elites. Usury -as we have rigorously defined it- links them all and whether they can convince the world that fractional reserve banking originated in China or not, THEY have always maintained and used it to enrich themselves.

THEY are specifically associated with capitalism (the making of money on money without actual work) and the financial support of all state socialism back through time, as the two isms were developed side by side by the same people to allow THEM to take over the world. There is no other intrinsic or further economic merit to either of these systems as presently conceived, period! No arguments are necessary or accepted. If you are a dog habituated to your vomit, etc. There is no help there. These present monetary organisms cannot be repaired, reformed, converted back into something older, better, finer, etc. They are deadly machines that only assist criminal cliques who claim ownership of most of the world, including you by FORCE. What do you say to that?

We also admit that as an old colleague said, “the more concealed it is, the better it works” and sometimes the safest place to hide something is right out in the open where most would never suspect a thing. That has also been the case for anything and everything relating to this blog's proposal, especially all the usual economics claptrap, all of it based on an ancient con game that needs to be … renounced for something better. “Come out of her, my people” was the precise expression my mentor grabbed to make his point when he gave me this assignment.

How aware are most people? Most people know the difference between SANITY and its absence without too much trouble and most people seek to live lives with the REASONABLE EXPECTATION of continuing peace. Most people are sheep, THEY are wolves. Or perhaps most are fish and THEY are sharks. Most live and love and work naturally: work as we consistently define it on this blog, is the time out of most people's lives in which they earn barter in terms of money. But THEY do not work. THEY envy and hate us for all of that and that statement can be verified countless times and in all kinds of places and in many languages. THEY always take and all THEIR gifts are at your expense. How do those who never work acquire the means to steal the world? It's THEIR money, stupid! Another mentor upon our very first meeting warned me, “beware of the rich.” Of course, at the time, I failed to pay much attention because I was interested in getting more of THEIR money.

So let's focus on THEIR BIGGEST and MOST USED tactics; It's a psychological term called PROJECTION; “it's not me, it's you.” THEY deliberately project onto others what THEY actually feel, believe and think. Hate speech? THEY invented it and use it all the time. I find it ironic in the extreme how those who constantly warn others not to judge them, so easily spew (a very emotional word) all the usual projected invective against their own interests, with NO REGARD FOR FACTS upon people they actually don't even know, because unbeknownst to the spewers, they are unaware of the successful brainwashing they have been subjected to for most of their lives.  

So how aware are most people, really? THEY, the authors of all the brainwashing THROUGH THEIR TAX EXEMPT, TAX DODGE BRAIN TRUSTS (wow, such brains!) INSTITUTIONS (FOUNDATIONS, NGO's, etc.) WHICH SPEW ALL THE “OFFICIAL” MEMES, “HATE SPEECH” ETC. ATTEMPTING FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE THROUGH THEIR IMAGE SYSTEM; “who is like unto the Beast?,” also perfected the Stockholm syndrome: if you don't know what it is, look it up. THEIR social conditioning was working pretty well up to recent political events which shall overturn them (turn over the tables and spill out all THEIR crimes).

How can you spot THEM? It's easy. THEY PROJECT, “it's not me, it's you” as a matter of course: it's so common a tactic that literally it is THEIR signature piece and biggest strategic weakness. When THEY make a charge, a JUDGMENT against someone THEY don't like, it is almost always a projection … and we are supposed to just jolly well go along with all this “official,” “approved” (by who and by what authority if not the truth?) “what to think” rubbish!

Here are some well worn examples of THEIR projections of hate:

Sexist: All of the power brokers in the world are men. No woman above the age of 28 or 30, other than their immediate female relatives, are ever usually permitted in their presence.

Oh and while we're at it, there are misogynists and misandrists as well, and then there's the whole trans-gender thing. Where do you suppose most if not all of this comes from? From sexual child abuse, asshole! That's where! So figure it out, most of THEM were sexually abused and when they grow up THEY like doing it because now it is their turn.

BTW, Sigmund Freud knew about all of this among the children of the royals and other important people in Austrian society and deliberately covered it up to remain in practice long enough to develop a theory he could use to his advantage in England; he was basically just another coward, con artist and opportunist with very little integrity. That's pulling a Paul Johnson* on someone; you dissect their lives down to their philosophical underwear and reveal what's left, if anything.  *(Johnson's book Intellectuals is a must read)

Meanwhile, right now across the world, all of this projection is paraded about and used as the social and personal dynamite that it is. But THEY use it to divide and conquer as THEY hate everyone equally.

And while we're at it, because we are discussing usually secretive organizations or associations of men (and nowadays a few women), we assert that there are “rights of passage” or “initiations” that usually involve blackmail of some sort or another and the women who do manage to gain prominence have had to shed innocent blood in some way to prove they are “worthy” of the brotherhood of darkness that power circles really are. Don't be so naive. Abortions are taken to mean just the same thing among them too.  Still think compromise is anything but a weak strategy? I have news for you: give your opponents absolutely nothing. They rarely deserve it.

Racist: All the power brokers in the world are racists. They believe that their race, specifically their personal bloodlines, should rule the world. Everyone else is just cattle, chattel, serfs (tied to the place they live) or vermin (people living over expensive resources) who can of course be sacrificed. Yeah and I do mean in the sense of making a blood sacrifice to one of THEIR gods. They have a “religion” all right and it aint atheism or even scientism. THEY would prefer that all mankind just accept THEIR right to rule and worship only THEM as gods. That was the message in Hunger Games and other popular series. If that's what THEY want and it is certainly against your best interests, then why compromise with such as these and THEIR programs? Higher purposes? THEY are LIARS! 

Homophobe: It is well known by the informed that homosexual men (and very increasingly homosexual women) are used by power brokers to get at what they most want; children. When these people are no longer of any further use, they are … liquidated, as the history of various purges plainly illustrates.

Xenophobe: Outsiders are hated by power brokers because everyone is an outsider to a power broker and they hate everyone, because they fear everyone, so they seek absolute control over everything; they have a god complex. Popular series like Star Wars are intellectual cartoon illustrations for the enlightened.

I'd like to add Femiphobe to the list too, since all power brokers really loathe and I expect fear the real power of women.

We might even see the word pediphobe invented soon. This would be fear of children? Or fear of pedophiles? I assure everyone: if we do not draw the line right here and right now and deal squarely with pedophilia and worldwide child trafficking, then frankly we are no good. Understood?

I suspect we may find out that all of THEM are mostly pedophiles and far worse! So yeah dammit, we need our own money and we need to pull away from all of such TRASH as THEM as soon as humanly possible … for our own survival.

So that's the short answer.
NOW, the longer answer:

I come with an armed mind. Some people out there are body builders. I understand and respect that. That's fine. Given my situation in life, I preferred mind building. Part of the process, is growing up to certain realities. Growing up means admitting that there really are enemies and genuinely bad people in the world and recognizing just who they are and what they do and are like in their habits, etc. There are the manipulators behind the scenes and they are aided by countless mindless drones who were created for the purpose of tearing down, jeering and destroying their opponents. For all these people spew forth for their usually unseen financiers, true self-consciousness was somehow bypassed. They are often remarkably incapable of any original thought on any important subject. A surprising number, when caught in their deceptions, attempt to escape by suggesting it was all a joke.

In my process, I have come to understand that enemies attempt to literally take control of your mind, your thinking, your decisions, your desires, your dreams, everything. Recent exposures of THEIR surveillance aparat proves this beyond doubt. I have developed and honed my present view of the world (it changes based on awareness of concrete evidence) based on a frank and intellectually incontestable analysis of groups of people. I used the emphasized words precisely: I intend to hold my views (until they are no longer my views) and am willing to defend them against contests from any source.

In other words, in order to suggest that what I say may be tendentious or untrue, you'd have to present incontestable relevant evidence. I said I come with an armed mind. I don't suffer fools gladly: if you are a clown, I will pull a Paul Johnson on you. I'm too old already to be doing this: younger, stronger and better men should appear to take this proposal to the next level. I have already outlived better men, true geniuses. But who cares about any of that these days? “While you were sleeping, THEY came and took that all away.” So instead, everyone is running scared, when they aren't fast asleep.

Meanwhile, while we all sleep, THEY are determining whether to kill us or to make it so difficult to move or make a living that THEY will give you a restricted sustainable income (THEIR money, not yours, of course) and FORCE you into THEIR multicultural cities (crime ridden slums), while THEY own the world. 6 people currently own more than half the rest of the world's population. Understood? So this blog's proposal really IS about YOUR future.

To begin with, about the first thing one throws out is all the usual academic or official bureaucratic attacks on your free speech. You toss out all of THEIR conceits. Sorry you may have paid for, or may still be paying for, a miseducation so terrible that frankly you've been scammed. When it comes right down to it, no matter what anyone else may claim to know, they are no more worthy than you of any more personal admonition or respect, except that they may use FORCE against you. I didn't mention BULLYING although I have mentioned jeering. They usually exert FORCE through control of THEIR money. (Right now we hear that THEIR offered prices for professional political agitators are pretty high. We have known that THEIR offered prices for professional terrorists has been and is pretty high as well).

Discovering the deceits, lies, subterfuges, etc. I no longer accept as true THEIR views. Yes, there is a fundamental social dialectic and always has been, between the ruled and the rulers, but it's not as simple as that. THEY are the people BEHIND the rulers. THEY are so mysterious to most people, seriously, as though THEY were part of some unseen FORCE that could never be contested. It would be like looking behind the forbidden door leading to all that is so evil that it is never spoken of.

Economics? Money and banking? Finance? It's all THEIRS. It is NOT from you therefore it is not of you, it doesn't issue from you, it is not yours. You are allowed to use it and that is all. Oh and ALL precious metals are also THEIRS.

So, all that academic or official economic analysis has to be tossed out as more than mere mental garbage; excess fat if you will. If you don't happen to agree, then I frankly may not even want to know you until your blinders fall off and you see things the way they are, void of all the usual claptrap.

Yeah, I went to college, ok? One of my basic impressions from my experience of “higher” education was spotting claptrap, except that we were often advised to gulp and accept it as necessary. THAT was mostly all of economics, banking and finance. Part of waking up consists in taking all the blinders off and seeing things exactly as they are, not shrouded in a lot of excess deference, respect or superstition.

Growing up and waking up consists in seeing everything as objectively and rationally as possible, as systems, background, all of it rather mechanical in fact and based on medieval, outmoded or archaic ideas. This list includes states, laws (THEY know nothing of law and strive to mold it to preserve the status of slaves and chattel and of course all law is mere FORCE), all schools, churches, synagogues, mosques, temples,  all religion, all politics, all economics, all academics, all of it is polluted by THEIR money and THEIR power structures. Truth is what sifts out of all of it and remains the truth regardless of whose interests are affected. Truth is the ultimate authority. Truth cannot be effaced by lies, slander, misdirection, as eventually as enough data is presented and properly organized and run through the time honored trivium, it remains truth.

If you wake up to discover that you are working for THEM, as I did, and I had my mentor to thank in part, then you quit. You make it a point of personal virtue to refrain from ever considering any occupation where you would work (take time off from the rest of your life to earn barter) for such as THESE with about the same resolve as one renounces sin.

But perchance you do work for any of these; are your services necessarily evil? Of course not. Most public servants, law enforcement and military really are among the best of us. We have reason to assert again that most people are aware enough to recognize and assume SANITY among others they deal with and for the most part seek a life with the REASONABLE EXPECTATION of continuing peace. Most do not presently live in war zones, but there are changes afoot.

Groups are naturally formed around basic natural associations which include family, extended families, nations, races, cultures, cults, traditions. THEY (globalists, bankers, elites) seek to destroy all that by whatever means and replace it with THEIR totalitarian PRIVATE corporate worldwide dictatorship. They'll use mass migrations of peoples to do whatever they want if possible. All THEIR plans and objectives are long since written and available. THEIR publicly stated religion is atheism, but the truth is now being revealed more openly. THEIR religion is called satanism more broadly. It promotes an amoral and unethical projection into the rest of natural human society and rewards its promoters. It is commercial, it always aims to sell, sell, sell, to patronize, pander to and project some exquisite view of possible prosperity to its victims. We have seen this satanic projection among more primitive cultures, in New Guinea, Indonesia and parts of India and the Arab world. It is always a minority but has tremendous power that is often as not associated with THEIR money, beginning with gold and silver.

So people being naturally people, the best thing each group of people could possibly be doing is getting its own act together. It doesn't matter at all, or help at all how anyone outside each group might feel or care about it. But come on now, it does take money. What? THEIR money? No, YOUR money. We have given all of you out there a BASIS for establishing your money. Why is this important? Money is as we've said, a human invention. Anyone could use it. It isn't cultural, and can be adapted to all cultures that we know of. It tends to lift the material living standards of the societies that use it.  Whole barter is what one has when civilizations have vanished and barbarism returns, times when life is for most, "nasty, brutish and short."

I'd like to think that it is possible for people everywhere to ask themselves just how much they complain about in the rest of the world is actually the result of chasing money. All the problems between the races? The police? Money. All the crazy passions set loose over the past year in America Pick a President 2016? Money. All the worldwide pedophile crime syndicate and even worse to be revealed that will sicken the best of you? Money, THEIR stinking money!

The rest of this blog is the long answer. I was not the author, only the messenger. Copernicus and Galileo were observant enough to see the obvious. So was E. C. Riegel and Arthur Kitson and others before him. You really want your Life, Liberty and Property back? You must take back your will and that invariably involves that indispensable human invention; money. Will you continue to be THEIR slave?

David Burton 
 
Current Hypothetical Value of a Hypothetical Value Unit

[1/24/17: Q: I really suppose that the Left proved themselves to be every bit as authoritarian as the right, except that their attempted overthrow of reality that these people have always dreamed of, so they could do what?  Act like they did at the recent events in DC?  Lily in California

A: Actually and people don't believe this of me, they always think I prefer the right, when I don't.  The GOP began in the 1850's as almost a communist party compared to the post war invention of the present Republican party.  My father was the first Republican in the family and said he did it for business reasons as lots of his clients  were GOP.  But both my grandfathers voted for Roosevelt and my great grandfather actually corresponded with him, which was brought to my attention by an official of a ... government spy organization from which I had inadvertently sought employment.  I could and probably should pen a short story about that interview.  It had the characteristics of a great story, including the lighting of the day, a cold and overcast typical New York City winter day. 

The issue has been equality.  It has been the issue since the end of the 18th century.  But the delusional ideas that we are all equal or in some sense must be FORCED to be is of no benefit to anyone ... except to THEM.  It is no benefit to those who feel wronged.  If you feel that way, honestly, healing begins from within and it doesn't matter what anyone else outside yourself says or thinks or does about you.  It's the time each one of us and each distinctive group of us is to be
getting its own act together

Here's where my recollection goes: it was back in the 1970's and I was a student in Berkeley, California and even in my shocking whiteness, I would walk down into Oakland to the Black Muslim Bakery to buy baked goods because they had the best product!  It was worth the walk and the money!  Now, you tell me what would have happened to that product had it gone big time industrial production?  It would have been destroyed.  Size and service area for each business matters and if the market is there we can and should have sufficient redundancy.  THAT my friends is civilization and a prosperous neighborhood worth living in and being proud of.  Am I getting through to some of you?    Oh, and BTW, it didn't matter AT ALL whether some white student bought from them, what really mattered was that their own people supported them! 

The current directions we all need to pursue are not the euphemism of perfect equality, which is impossible, but by establishing from the ground up the distinctive capabilities of each one of us as individuals and as groups.  Economics, the movement of money, begins with where the money comes from.  If it comes from governments or banks then it is THEIRS and THEY decide.  If it is YOU who issue it, by extension any group, then it is YOU who decides.  Understood?  I certainly hope so.  Peace and prosperity in these coming years to all!]   

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

#0: Web Bot hits Bitcoin price again ($888) Chilling predictions of Web bot report


Once again, we admonish all those fond of bitcoin and any other crypto-currencies, that their days of playing their risk with their excess money, making a return on money without actually selling some of your time or your effects (capitalism) may be numbered.  Bitcoin is clearly a central bank darling.  It is a prototype for what THEY (globalists, bankers, elites) intend doing.  They gave you those little plastic cards, and phone apps so you wouldn't have to carry around all that tangible reference to money so now THEY get to know every transaction you make.  Recall that we said that the real value of cash consisted in the anonymity of trade.  Now taking any of THEIR money, probably precious metals and precious stones are the ultimate cash.  We see things a lot like Jim Sinclair would except we add a knowledge of history and some common sense to as it were turn perceptions on their heads: none but individual human beings have the right to issue money (which excludes any businesses, banks or states) and they do it in the act of buying something.  Further and drawing directly from that, no one need be paid in any money but their own.  This we call the self financing of labor and it admits that no one may be "bought" by another, which restores two things from the natural law at once; liberty and property.  The limits to issue are determined by the community that agrees to use this money.  It must NOT be a commodity because that opens the money up to speculation, as all THEIRS, including bitcoin, are subject to. 

Rather than a commodity, our proposal is based on a unit of purchasing power that has already happened.  Since it already happened, it wont change.  In order to determine at any time what THEIR stuff is worth to us, we take the present value of that already past unit of purchasing power. 

What was $2.16 for each unit, which we call a Value Unit or Valun, the same name given it by E. C. Riegel is now $2.84.  What is this unit of purchasing power?  It is that on the second of November in 2011 one could buy to own and hold in your hand an ounce of gold bullion for $2.160.  So you see, we agree with Sinclair about gold and if one attempts to offer anything better than what THEY have always sold us, one will FAIL if one neglects the importance of gold.  We also know of many economies that ran for a while on silver so we acknowledge silver as similar to gold in its function.  


But here's where we disagree with Sinclair.  It has been sold that money is a store of value.  Let's demonstrate why this cannot ever be so.  A store of value is itself something one buys.  If money is just another commodity then we are stuck back at whole barter and terms of whole barter always change.  Gold and silver being uncommon, their value would be uncommon.  How many cows or horses could one buy with gold and silver of whatever weight?  You'd be back at whole barter and the unique situation to be in would be to be of the people controlling that scarce commodity.  And studying world history from the standpoint of the flows of precious metals has been a time honored way to know the rise and fall of empires.

But this blog isn't about empires, it is about empowering everybody; everyman and everywoman.  THIS is the basis of our proposal.  Be advised: If one has any of THEIR money they wish to exchange for any of ours, it will be ONLY in terms of gold and silver.  THAT is how we establish linkage with THEM until THEY are ... not in the money business, because that certainly is THEIR future.  We have to be prepared for that eventuality.  It was E. C. Riegel's concern after seeing the effects of inflation on money and on society and people.  It was what concerned my mentor during the final months of his life and it was the mission that he set me to, which led to finding E. C. Riegel, Arthur Kitson and soon others.  Since many of these are German or Swiss/German in origin, do we propose to label this a "German" school of economics?  No.  This is not economics as THEY have always meant it.  Since economy is nothing but the movement of money, using a monetary unit that does not change is going to determine what actual values are more consistent with each other over longer periods of time; bread and butter as well as gold and gasoline. 

If the money proposal presented in this blog was no better than THEIRS why would we bother?  It's because it is the only one out there that is actually based on YOU rather than THEM or some scarce commodity out there, that matters most.


Be seeing you

Sunday, January 8, 2017

#110: Liberty and Will

This piece focuses attention on where value originates. We aren't even going to consider what any academic economist has to say, as they have always the wrong end of everything, because as we have maintained consistently throughout this blog, standard economics only seeks to explain monetary operations with reference to their own institutions and traditions rather than objective reality and common sense.

What was Thomas Paine's contribution to our awareness of things? A book he called Common Sense. He's also responsible for the name of the American Republic: the United States of America and he, rather than Jefferson, probably wrote the Declaration of Independence. What did Tom Paine have? He had will.

This will he certainly understood as an inalienable right, something each of us has by birth without any support or recognition by any state. in part we'll focus on an extension of this will, an invention we all recognize as money. If you look at the money you use, one thing should be easily understood; neither you or I had anything to do with it. We use all the time what does not belong to us and we use all kinds of rationalizations to maintain the exact opposite of the literal facts. It's as if you have never seen straight a day in your life until someone gives you a new pair of glasses. You claim something is yours when in fact it has never been yours and you are actually FORCED and compelled into using it. By whose will? Oh, the “corporate will” or the “state will” or even the “national will,” or any other clever LIE to cover the obvious facts of the ownership of all money (including bitcoin or any other crypto-currency or precious metals; it is ALL theirs, not yours or mine) and how it has been used by states and private interests down through time to enslave the people of the world. The solution is NOT doing away with money, it is accepting the responsibility for issuing our own. You all need to start thinking for yourselves and asking just whose will you are following every day of your lives. If you don't, you are nothing but a chattel slave and expendable to the owners of the present money. Understood?

When you get up and go to work every day, it is a matter of your will. If you attend school and must attend classes then you do so as a matter of your will. You exercise your will in everything that you do. If you eat or drink something, even however compulsively, you have exercised your will. Nothing has any objective value to you unless it facilitates your will.

Now, even if this is true, and it certainly is true, most people automatically assume that value is determined by other people who deal in things and things relative to other things is what constitutes value and that is what is measured in money terms. Prices edge up while our salaries edge down and no one has enough money and many have been out of work with decent skills for a very long time. Sometimes things are cheap and at other times more expensive with no apparent real supply reason as an explanation. Indeed, the simple conjecture that price inflation is due to commodities speculation, including speculation on the money itself as a commodity to be speculated upon, and the absurd idea that speculators are somehow immune from any serious losses in what they do, and you arrive at where we are today; in a world where it is envied to play games with money, making more money on money without any serious work involving the production, processing or sale of any good or service. Eventually when there are no jobs because these people deem it cheaper to have stuff made somewhere else and shipped in for you to buy with what? Right, you lost your job some time ago and your credit is shot because of … well you can't live on borrowed money forever. Well that's just what we ARE living under right now.



Right now I'd like you all to go to the nearest mirror and take a good look at yourself. Go ahead, I'll wait. Take a real good look at yourself and then come back.

You were just looking at the origin of all value; you yourself. Each of you saw in the mirror who you are and you remind yourself what you can each do, what you have done well, what you liked doing, how you best liked spending your time, the kinds of things you liked participating in, making, growing, producing, even if those be entertainment events, anything. You are looking at the origin and determination of all value everywhere. Now look at this.

Yeah, it's a gold coin. It's more of THEIR money, THEIR oldest brand. Someone says it's worth something and will always be worth something. But that price changes daily because it is part of a commodity that is subject to speculation on future supply and demand and that's how its price is determined. ALL commodities used as money are like this. So prices are subject to far more speculation and they go up and down, usually up and building the basis for a steady economy free of bubbles, the "grow or die" imperative, etc. becomes increasingly impossible until eventually the whole thing crashes. It's in the process of self destruction right now and there is not a thing that will save it, nothing. If you build on the wrong premises, expect failure. If you do it again and again and again and again, as we have done, it's a wonder we aren't extinct for being so stupid.  

If I have before me a 1 oz gold coin and a ½ kilo loaf of bread, what is the relationship between the two and what is the common measure capable of measuring them both? It's that invention we call money. But we have a hard fuzzy to remove from our brains and thinking: gold (and silver) are commodities. Just because coins made of precious metals are in limited supply and few people have them doesn't make them any more desirable to serve to measure the value of either the gold or the bread. Bread too is a commodity so measuring things in terms of bread is equally as silly.

We need something that relates to both, but if given a choice of universal exchanges between our money and THEIRS, most would prefer being on a gold basis than a bread basis. In any case, I'd choose a piece of purchasing power to represent the common unchanging yardstick that would determine the relationship between the two on a fairly consistent basis. That piece of purchasing power is represented by our proposed transaction; 1 oz AU BU = V1,000 on 11/2/11. The price of the gold was V1,000 and the bread V1. Would those be the likely prices for these same objects today? It's likely that today (1/6/17) the bread would still be around V1. The gold has fallen in price against the Valun, so maybe the gold is only worth V673.50 and that would be the Valuns to get physical possession too. Gasoline would have changed price dramatically since Valun inception as well. That should tell us something about the natural price variances between things like bread and butter vs. gold and gasoline. The purpose of money, what is usually called “sound” money, is to reliably measure the value of things in terms of barter and where the prices tend to remain stable over long periods of time. You decide based on how much money you have what you will buy and you decide based on your value of that item, good or service. The Valuns in your hand arrived there through your will. Are you getting it yet?

The basis of your money, how you make it sound: The Riegel advantage is the choice of something that is already done, that is not going to change, a deal in the past that will not change because it already was. You compare everything to that transaction. You take the present value of it in THEIR money and get a fair trade evaluation of what everything else costs. Over time, a very short time too, all mid to long term business planning will be far easier in Valuns because prices will assume standard points and will be subject only to the laws of LOCAL supply and demand. That DOES mean that whoever has the most of anything and is capable of getting it to anywhere is likely to command the LOWEST price for anything. But the law of diminishing returns to scale is still in play and precludes any monopolies and encourages economic redundancies and the more of that one has the better. What capitalism has produced and does produce are economic deserts that leave the vast majority operating just above bankruptcy in some state socialist ghettos. What our proposal will produce is vibrant LOCAL economies that will quickly spread around the world, since we are using the same standard for our money and the same ledger just stretched around the world. We do not need any states or any piles of precious metals to do any of this.

But it all comes about because you exercise your natural right and will decide to do it, you WILL to do it and you get enough people in your LOCAL community to become interested enough to read the blog, get the proposal and begin thinking and working toward making their will a validated and understood reality. You'll need something, and we'll all need it together and will need to rely on each other in order to satisfy our individual will.

Why did I bring this up? Your will? That's your FIAT. It has been stolen from you since before you were born. You were born a slave and you'll die a slave, but meanwhile the shackles of their prison are failing and will fail. What then? Want to trade more shackles from THEM when THEIR current system implodes? More of THEIR money (either THEIR credit or gold?). WHY? They do NOT deserve your trust! It is YOUR life. Exercise your WILL not THEIRS.

Take your fiat back. You have to get others to do it with you too. This is something that can only be recognized as all recognize it in others. We each have a right to our own value and our own will and must stand up and assume it. We have been enslaved long enough. Do it.

David Burton
venlead2013@aol.com

Current Hypothetical Value of a Hypothetical Value Unit