Wednesday, April 26, 2017

#0: Meet Goldman Sachs, the Vampire Squid - James Corbett

Meet Goldman Sachs, the Vampire Squid - James Corbett

Placed here for more education.  What one comes away with is something like that these people have a "huge franchise on the world capital markets" and they represent the US dollar and any number of other currencies, which are just brands of THEIR (globalist, banker, elite, pedophile, satanist, etc.) money, not yours or mine, though the general opinion is that since it is in your wallet or at least in your bank account that it is really yours.  If that's true just go try and withdraw a large amount into cash.  Right: it's not your money.  That's why this blog exists.  Money is something we all need.  We need it on our own terms, not THEIRS.  We can't expect anything from THEM as things are working pretty damn well for THEM.  We have to consider what we WILL do.  Note also the connection between this particular bank and the CIA.  We also note in passing that bitcoin has been discussed on line as the preferred method of transacting business for the world's human trafficking networks.  Stay away from it!  It's just more of THEIR money and someone else can throw a switch and whatever bitcoin you have is no more.  It isn't yours and it will never be yours.  Understood yet?  This is a serious matter.  Consider it and then offer some feedback and some resolution to help.         

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

#0: Early Morning Thoughts - John Southerland

Let’s imagine for a minute that we are inside a prison. It’s not a bad prison, and in fact, this prison is called Camp Snoopy by many – what could be more benign than that, eh. But we are there for a drug related offense, and we have to stay there. We sleep in a barracks type of sleeping quarters with no privacy, and we get 3 meals a day. We can call out to family and friends, but our telephone calls are monitored and recorded. We are even able to walk around the facility, and we can find books to read. But our personal property is locked away in lockers, and we get no choice of what we eat in the cafeteria. In fact, we have no idea what is being put into our food and water. When we want to do something, we fill out a chit and ask the jailers for permission. We are not allowed to protect ourselves from others, and in fact, if we get into any sort of fight, we are punished. People can come and visit us, but they need to pass inspection of the jailers. If we want, we can request menial jobs in the jail to help pass the time away. We get paid a small amount of money for our work. If we are good prisoners, we can get our sentence reduced for good behavior. But, after serving this prison sentence, we now have a prison record. Finding work in the future will be difficult, and that may push us down into a life of crime. And in the eyes of our friends and relatives, we are no longer good people.

So, the question for today is - what is the difference between this life in prison and life in modern America? In America, we can’t come or go without government permission (passport and state ID). We can’t work without government permission (social security number). We have no choice in our foods (government supports GMO foods). We sleep in houses that are not ours to own – everything belongs to government. We can’t travel by car without government permission (driver’s license, car registration). We can’t change our prison guards – they work for government and are unelected. We can’t choose the money system we want to use, that is controlled by the shadow government. If we break ‘laws’ while traveling (e.g. traveling too fast, or not paying off government by way of taxes), we are punished. We have no privacy, no matter how we try to communicate with others – everything is wiretapped. We can’t defend ourselves against others, especially government police who are able to kill us for any reason. We can’t criticize the criminals inside government or we will be punished.

Some of the points I raised may be discussed, and I could be flat out wrong in my analogy, but I don’t think so. It is my opinion that we live in a giant open air plantation system of totalitarian government. Non-producing government employees (plantation masters) almost outnumber those in the private sector (plantation slaves), and they are above the people in status. Whereas the people in government can kill or imprison us, the private sector can’t do that to the people in government, even when deserved.

This is an unbalanced system we have in America, and it has been unbalanced for a long time – ever since 1913 when the federal government and the American economy was turned over to the private bankers by those in government who allegedly represented us. Today the American system of government and banker control over us is so big, so evolved, so criminal, and so well tuned that it is questionable whether the system can be saved, or whether the people, now drugged out by the plantation masters, will have to revolt against their slavery to government. Maybe it’s time to shut down this government completely.

And that raises other questions about government. Is government always bad for the people? Should any form of government ever be kept in place for a period of time longer than 25 years? Does each generation have the right to have its own form of government? Does a two class society (like ours) always require the force and violence of government to ensure its survival? Does government always grow in size? And, as an aside, why does government have deep underground bunkers for its survival and protection while the people do not have that same underground protection mechanism? Why should the sacred cows in government be protected while the people perish? Is there any way to prevent sociopaths from achieving power and control over others?

Is there anyone left who is proud of America and its Zionist controlled government? Inquiring minds want to know.

John Southerland

[oh and this excellent example of the social prose of our time also showed up today:]

They [the common people] WANT TO BELIEVE but nothing they believe is TRUE nor can they discern truth because it proves everything they believe to be a LIE and then they could no longer BELIEVE.

Any form of ENLIGHTENMENT can be nothing more than the crumbling away of BELIEF in the face or TRUTH established by reason, fact and evidence.

NATURAL LIBERTY / NATURAL LAW are based on PROVABLE FACT / OBJECTIVE TRUTH which require NO BELIEF. FRAUD, TYRANNY and EXTORTION are based on LIES which can only exist for as long as there are those STUPID ENOUGH to BELIEVE IN THEM. 

Hence we have two completely different and separate SPECIES of humanity which exist as diametrically opposed ENEMIES and have absolutely NOTHING in common with each other. One existing in the pursuit of KNOWLEDGE and HUMAN PROGRESS and the other existing as a VIRUS unto this earth, a VIRUS unto US and a VIRUS unto THEMSELVES however their BELIEFS keep them too IGNORANT, STUPID and MORALLY BANKRUPT to RECOGNIZE THIS.

Neither have they [the VIRUS group] the right to VIOLATE the NATURAL LIBERTY or ability to function of EVEN ONE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL with their IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, BELIEFS, OPINIONS, GREED and ENVY no matter how many of them there are and EVERY SINGLE HUMAN INSTITUTION from Organized Religion to Political Philosophies exists to enable these STUPID SHEEP and PIGEONS, this HUMAN VIRUS, to FLOCK TOGETHER under the leadership of PSYCHOPATHS in order to enable them to DO JUST THAT.


David Brown

[Again, we post these as examples of current expressions of discontent.  Oh, and one more thing; "turning the tables" is exactly what Jesus did.  The times we're in are similar.  Except that this blog's proposal prefers simply having our own machine and institutions and ultimately walking out on THEM.  Understood?]

Thursday, April 20, 2017


Basic education.  A lot of it here.  If they read this blog, they will understand further how far we have all been led astray.  Gold and silver (and bitcoin, recently revealed to be the favored payment method for all human trafficking worldwide) is THEIR money, not yours or mine.  To the extent that anyone relies on money that they did not personally issue, the further along the road to absolute slavery will they follow.  This blog offers the only serious alternative and of course I have yet to hear from anyone seriously considering it.  I'm beginning to feel like Noah before the flood.  Seriously.

Be seeing you  

Oh, and one more thing.  These people have the best arguments for exactly why precious metals are still THEIR money, not yours or mine.  Read this blog and see what we consider the only monetary use for gold and silver in a real honest money system, NOT one spawned by the usual senseless and beside the point sophistries of the usual economists, no thanks.  Read this blog and then decide.    

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

#57.9 Perspective - Getting There

(Written on 4/10/17) This happens to be a weird sort of personal anniversary. It was on April 10, 1977, exactly 40 years ago, that I set out on a bus from San Francisco to Boston and New York, a journey that was to decide the direction my life would take from there on out. I was born, raised and educated in Northern California and I desperately wanted to get out and go east and see the world. What was very odd about it was that New York in particular should exert such a hold on me, almost as though I had actually lived there before or needed to belong there for some reason. Manhattan began to seem about as familiar as though it had always been my home town. I was more than proud of being able to tell out of towners how to get someplace. There were many reasons I suppose, for being in New York in the eighties and then in Atlanta in the nineties and of course to have returned to upstate New York rather than returning to California, by then mostly abandoned by my family for parts north and east. Being here in the Northeast was, among other things, for me to pursue the course set by my father to learn more about and understand money.

We have used the analogy of the Titanic to describe the present disorder with its DECEPTIVE democratic republican front, rule by babblers, by the worst possible types of people, which the government machine selects due to its very design. By the way, back when the Church (in the West the RC and in mother Russia and parts east, the Orthodox), that particular reigning machine of the times likewise tended to select and promote the very worst sorts of characters to DARE to claim the right to rule over the rest of us, the stupid and unwashed of the world. We'll stick to our proposition that all human institutions and organizations are essentially social machines complete with inputs, outputs and procedures and of course, since THEIR money is always involved, the kick-back to people making money on money without work is always present.

You know, just here, how about a nice slap across the face to every last so called “social justice warrior” out there: you are a bunch of ignorant fools who haven't the slightest idea of what you assume you know and think about anything! Mostly you are traitors to yourselves first and foremost. Honestly if you feel so bad about yourselves, the rest of us, the way things are, perhaps you might as well … just go off somewhere and die quietly so as not to upset the lives of THEM (globalists, BANKERS, elites of all kinds, PEDOPHILES: people who rape, kill and eat children! and Luciferians: people who assume they are the “enlightened light bearers” to the rest of society, etc.). With THEM is the contract you have all unwittingly signed onto apparently before any of you were born and they have your birth certificates as “assets” to attempt to prove something that could only be by FORCE thereby overthrowing the worldwide programming that attempts to convince us that all the democratic republican front is really of our making and supports us. Those of you who have taken THEIR money to foment civil strife are guilty of even greater crimes.

Increasingly we see social disintegration that is deliberately promoted by a gang of super rich thugs. Has anyone bothered to ask how THEY got their money? THEY STOLE IT. So what are you going to do about it, little man and little woman? It was always THEIR money to begin with, even silver and gold. So this is just one more thing you have been stupid about all your life. Does that mean that money per se is an evil device? Anyone who thinks so is either deceived or a deceiver and we have seen both. No, money is just a human invention, like the wheel or running water. But all money anyone knows of is THEIRS and so is THEIR machine and THEIR brand of it that is at fault. In fact, more than ever before, we need to start seriously thinking about developing our own use of this time and energy saving invention and with it our own social machine to support it.

Social trends around us are suggesting going very small or bugging out of society altogether. This is the DIRECT result of too much debt. We said in numerous papers that mountains of debt is the cancer that eventually kills economies and with the destruction of economies, standards of living and future fulfillment of all legitimate human aspirations begin to fall.

The ideas of abundance and perpetual security are fading away as everyone scrambles to be doing less with less, deciding to accede to the infringing of their very lives and futures, for whose benefit? The earth? Earth abides whether we do or do not. So for whose benefit? The holders of debt. So the cancer analogy is apt; just as cancer usually kills its victims by starvation, so too does excessive debt kill economies.

We see a landscape of nearly abandoned relics of old villages and towns, mostly in need of paint and repair, but who cares? It would only mean higher taxes and where's the money to buy paint when you have to pay taxes and pay off debt? Besides, you see they are all abandoned, so who comes to them anymore? What economic use do any of them serve? Perhaps it would have been better to demolish most of them twenty years ago. You know what? The globalists certainly think so too. You can find out more of what THEY intend as THEY have written it elsewhere.

We also see the social machines that replaced the old village and town centers populated with real mom and pop businesses that represented real wealth because all of it provided an income. The destroyers of all that wealth in turn built the huge well lit, open 24/7, temples of commerce surrounded by many acres of parking lot. Look at the parking lots, mostly empty or emptier now than usual and inside the stores fewer people too. Imagine going to a large store just to get away from most people. So far, full shelves and low enough prices, but less and less money and THEY want to do away with cash and call the cops when you pull out too much money from one of their machines or transfer it somewhere else. So whose money is it anyway? It is the first and most important question for you to answer.

We see that everything comes from somewhere else rather than where we are and nobody gets that while in the past people dealt with their neighbors and got attentive service, these days one is apparently happy to pad around some huge warehouse on concrete slabs all day where the people waiting on you came from somewhere around the world and so do the products.

We can't tell, but we don't believe that one is likely to find Wal-Marts, Targets, etc. in China manned by Arabs, Africans or Mexicans. We ask ourselves why all of this is necessary? Does any of it actually benefit Arabs, Africans or Mexicans, or for that matter Chinese, Europeans or Americans very much? Who then does all of this momentum to monopolize all markets benefit? Who must be paid before everyone else? Governments. Why? Bankers demand it. Whose money is it? Are you getting it yet?

Honestly, this blog is not about any of that, its proposal is in fact a way to get away from all of that, because as can be ascertained through data documented elsewhere, not exclusively on this blog, THEIR system cannot last forever and will not accomplish its goal of worldwide domination. It is unnatural to expect anything else but disaster for the present order / disorder. THEY (globalists, BANKERS, elites, pederasts, Luciferians, scribes, Pharisees, pundits, experts, technocrats, etc.) will not succeed at taking over the world because THEIR “big useless plans” defy Nature. They are once again flouting the law of diminishing returns to scale and shall pass away (go extinct) just like the dinosaur – and THEIR “public” corporations will as well.

For instance, and we hate to be obvious about it, but we will insolently point it out anyway: THEY are said (and written and heard) to favor “diversity” whether that's racial, cultural, ethnic, however. If all are the same in every regard, then there aint no diversity now, is there? I suppose it makes little difference to point out that such globalist objectives show complete disrespect for real natural diversity; it isn't about what each of the people want it is what THEY want for “the masses.” THEY want all of us to be hooked onto ideas of “fairness” or “equality” or “community” (It Takes a Village, etc.) and tell me, just who is it that decides for everyone else? It certainly aint you, that's for sure, pal.

Why are you necessarily supposed to go along with any of it? That's just how people get themselves into wars. That too is not a subject this blog is directly about, accept to say that of course the “military-industrial complex” which along with banking in all its present forms, goes straight back to good old ancient Babylon (see David Astle), ruled by a bureaucratic cadre of scribes (technocrats) who were in turn the fronts for the few at the top that claimed to own everyone and everything in sight; the Lucifierians (enlightened bearers of light) of their own times. 

So according to recent financial reports, if THEY apparently need THEIR money more than you do, in order to try and keep THEIR frauds alive, what do you need? You wont be able to decide a thing without determining your own value to yourself and just how you intend on making that wonderful innate wealth of yours shine forth to others so that you can trade what you have for what you want.

If you live in a dingy village only because people don't want to pay for repainting it, cleaning it up, etc. then the Valun Labour Contract enables anyone to do what needs to be done, to be paid in one's own money generated from the will (FIAT) of those who backed it with their own labor. Oh, there may be a few dollars into it too, after all there are taxes to be paid in THEIR money, but the local economy, those who grow things locally, provide services locally, etc. would benefit as long as there were a sufficient (say 10%) of the value in “public” money to settle taxes, into the work done. “I'll do it for 5 and 3” might become common, meaning five Valuns and $3 per hour worked. Five Valuns is usually between $12 and $15. Right now at $2.75 five Valuns is $13.75 (4/10/17).

Like it or not, people are attracted to doing business in areas that look clean and well looked after, so there is always need of this kind of work. Much of the work to do this upkeep is not paid at present. A Valun system would help correct this and improve everyone's lives accordingly.

Since all money is evidence of debt, what one is doing by working and issuing one's own money for it, is backing a debt of time out of the rest of your life or work. This debt instrument, in our case a V-Check, allows the holder to transfer the funds at the local exchange described to their own account in trade for a good or service provided in their community. 

This movement of value measurement through a community is what is known as economy or co-money, the movement of money with the associated transfer of goods and services providing the basis for … civilization. All of the apparent and not so apparent values are added to end products that come to us in streams of abundance, because everyone really is capable of finding and developing their innate wealth, always producing an income, under a Valun based system far more than under the present system.

And who do you contact when THEIR system fails and all of THEIR money is gone or unavailable to you? None of THEM will help you with anything except onto a bus to one of their “camps.” You really do need to get out and meet more people, we all do. We need to know who lives around us, and more importantly work together for our own local common benefit. It's really the only way forward. We literally have to keep out of THEIR way until THEY fail. We have to decide what will make our villages LIVE again. We have to decide who and for what anyone would venture into them and what business they would expect to do in each village. Same for towns, sections of cities, areas of vast countryside, each area has its own innate commonwealth potential. We look forward to a time of local prosperity, no poverty, a real human potential movement, deciding what we will do and how we will live, etc. the return of free PRIVATE enterprise and PRIVATE property, the re-invigoration of natural social institutions; families, extended families, clans, nations, etc.

[4/12/17: You know, Mr. Burton, for any of this to work out well, we are all going to have to treat each other better. What you're asking us to do is form another private organization that duplicates functions but belongs to us. It is democratic rather than autocratic, even with your board of trustees, with which I agree. But I really think character matters and were we to do this, we would have to insist on people who are widely known to us to be good people, so I guess you are calling as many good people together as you can. It will take people who are the best, who really care about the future, who see through all the lies and bullshit. Beth in Kansas


There was something else that I meant to say in this post and it concerned the rich (those with personal net assets of at least $100 million). I suspect that doesn't represent that many people. You see those who have been successful in this economy but are not that rich, certainly understand the personal risk and the opportunities taken to achieve their social position relative to the rest of us. The problem is one of altitude; those with more of THEIR money see everyone else from a more elevated position and then things get distorted.

It's great to know of “toxic internationalism” and all that but at the end of the day, it's each one of our lives that matters, where we are and who we are and who those around us really are, etc. One primary reason for having our own money is to return value to ourselves where we are and take it away from THEM (as previously identified).]

#0: David Icke - Point of No Return

David Icke - Point of No Return

There are matters referenced indicating this podcast came from before the 2016 election and perhaps before Brexit in June of 2016.  Now it didn't, it just seems like it.  Nevertheless the information is still relevant and the processes Icke discusses are still underway despite whatever apparent changes have occurred, simply because of all the matters we have discussed concerning THEIR money, not yours or mine. It IS the fundamental reason behind every real evil in the world. Sill think this blog's proposal isn't important? What will it take? Are you still working for them for THEIR money? OK, have a nice life. But you're still nothing but one of THEIR free range slaves. Ever wonder why things are STILL not right anywhere in the Western world and getting worse everywhere else? It has EVERYTHING to do with money. It's time to wake up, wise up and get a real education.
Be seeing you

Friday, April 7, 2017

#0: Daily News Segment - CTM #719 - With John B Wells

Daily News Segment - CTM #719 - With John B Wells

A kind of watershed news broadcast that certainly describes things that are congruent with this blog's criticism of the present disorder.  

Thursday, April 6, 2017

#57.8 Perspective - Money and Contracts

Those who have followed along this far have already read all the previous numbered (above #0 news) papers and understand the proposal. For instance, fewer than we would like have read #84.

Those advocating some limited supply of some commodity as money are actually advocating economic suffocation and THEIR counter price inflation explanations are also erroneous because all money dies in depreciation. We buy all THEIR junk economics because THEY run the show … until THEY no longer do. This blog is not about what THEY do, have done or are doing. It is about you and what you and those immediately around you are doing.

Briefly again, the proposal is to establish our own monetary accounting machine, institutions to support it, money that issues from us not THEM (globalists, bankers, elites, pedophiles, satanists, etc. you are what you are by association). Ours is to overlay any and all natural human society and run parallel to THEIR machine, so that when THEIRS finally fails, we can then have things our way. Understood? You want your freedom? Where is your money? Without that, you are a slave; THEIR slave. This proposal is not a secret society, but it is private. It is based on the simple natural law of contracts between people that was before, is today and will be after any state. So we begin with the road to freedom being paved with all kinds of explicit and implicit contracts and that among them is the right to ORGANIZE by association our own monetary union apart from THEIRS.  

So this blog is not primarily about THEM or THEIR machines. You can find out plenty of relevant information by following a few of the sources listed down the right side of this page under NEWS sources. THEY are the present disintegrating order, the final disgusting beast imperium that rules the world at the present moment. This blog is not about any of that either. It assumes that you know about all of that already. That's what being aware and awake amounts to. You already know that we are ruled by the basest of men (and a few of the worst possible women) and that the entire rotten system is all rigged to support the few at the top. This blog isn't about THEM, it's about us and how we deal with each other day to day, year in and year out and how we will have our will matched with our claimed desires for freedom represented by our own money.

In the United States, this proposal is understood as included within the 1st Amendment to the Constitution (which THEY hate and even today, always attempt to break, have indeed already long since before we were all born broken, but which is also not what this blog is about).
Each one of us has the NATURAL (not CIVIL) right to contract with another except for that which the state regards as criminal activity. If THEY say that THEY have a monopoly over all contracts dealing in money, then you live under a tyranny that deliberately blocks your right to contract. Riegel said just that. There are a few states where laws exist that would prevent any of our proposal from moving forward easily. Again, exposure of THEIR criminal and unlawful behavior is the best weapon we have. The more people that become ACTIVE, aware and awake to the reality that this so called representative democracy we live under is just in place to protect the “special” interests, then it will be recognized more widely that politics is nothing more than a public show to hide THEIR out and out tyranny.
There is indeed much in law concerning such matters that also needs to be repealed and TORN OUT OF ALL THE LAW BOOKS and never regarded again, as they are deliberate attempts to break the 1st Amendment, and by same amendment, I have the right to say, think and write such anywhere in public view, where it can be freely discussed, debated, etc. Hey, if you really care about unmasking the tyranny in democratic republican garb that we live under, try forming an alliance that is only interested in repealing law not making more of it. Most of us would be happy to join.

Previously, I noted that attorneys would naturally figure pretty broadly throughout our intended machine. We will need protection and the attorneys we seek would naturally see things from a natural law perspective.

All owners have a vote and they vote for the officers of their local exchanges who run for those offices and serve for a term of one year. Behind the elected officers are a board of trustees.

The local boards I have in mind for each exchange are actually like boards of trustees and I'll make it easier by also stating that such as we seek should be completely beyond reproach as well known community leaders; either they own sizable businesses in the area or they manage large estates, are perhaps farmers, etc. the pillars of society. You want on your boards people you can trust, so in fact they would be boards of trustees. These are the men among men, women among women, natural leaders. If you have few people following you around you're probably not a leader. Out of this body would be chosen among themselves rotating positions as officers of the initial bodies (yes, corporations in the same sense) and they would be the usual officers of President, Vice President and Secretary to rotate among themselves for terms of a year up until the first election by the owners which will be signaled by owner membership rising above a specific number of owners. The number of owners above 10,000 might be what is required to set off the democratic process.

Individual membership in our business / monetary machine is called A membership and only A members have voting rights and pay dues. B memberships are for businesses, largely or wholly made up of A members, just as Riegel described it. Only A members can issue money under our proposal, again just as Riegel described it. B members (for profit business organizations) are made up of A members.

Regarding B members, since the business functions in local “public” money already, all that is done is that an overlay is created by each local node, which we call an exchange rather than a bank. Since money is inseparable from accounting and not just represented by the quantity (commodity) of its tokens, each B member account enables each member business to manage its monetary assets in Valuns.

The institutional nodes we call exchanges because we aren't actually in favor of banks, banking, or the present practices of THEIR finance structures. Again, you can find out all you want about THEIR system elsewhere and that is also not what this blog is about.  

Each exchange would be in the business of selling advertising of its member businesses all in “public” money at first (until we have the businesses within our VEN to print our own V-Checks, etc.). These ads would be part of the designs on the reverse sides of our functioning currency, the proposed V-Check. To all our B members, the money they spend on advertising is a legitimate cost of doing business.
So this proposed overlay consists of accounts for each member. These accounts will resemble checking accounts, with some added features, as described elsewhere in this blog.
The monetary unit used is the proposed international standard Value Unit or Valun, the same name proposed by Riegel. Right now, the proposed Valun is roughly $2.75 (3/28/17). Our money is called a Value Unit or a Valun. Value Units would be referenced in regular conversation as Valuns. Each Valun represents an unchanging unit of purchasing power rather than a unit of a commodity (which is what ALL of THEIR money represents, including bitcoin). One cannot presume an international standard of value / exchange measurement, unless the basis does not change.

A Valun changes its exchange in dollars, gold, etc. based on the present value, in THEIR money of course, of the original, initial transaction which has already happened and established forever (or at least until the price of gold breaches this initial transaction). Then the initial transaction goes up, never down, and the resulting Valun becomes even harder relative to all of THEIR money.

As we said, if you intend on preserving purchasing power in your monetary system, you deliberately build that intention into your system. The proposed Valun is already the heaviest money in the world and will always intentionally be so.  [It was brought to my attention that a few of the Gulf states have heavier currencies so we would be in good company.]   In fact we can roundly say that any investments, savings, etc. in all THEIR money is fatally doomed to suffer inflation, whereas it would be very difficult to break a Valun, once established (since it is never a unit of commodity nor exchanged on that basis, ever)

Each A member is entitled to issue money for any work already paid in any other money, so again a parallel series of contracts is set up at the exchange, which runs parallel to payment in “public” money. At the present, there are income taxes and since Valun issuance through work definitely constitutes income, all money as earned
income within our machine is still subject to taxes based on THEIR money, not ours. Nothing about this proposal is a tax dodge, so if you thought it was, please look elsewhere. A members would be issued 1099's (or equivalent) each year and the “public” money they earn would go to pay these taxes. Taxes are always each member's responsibility.
How much extra income would one acquire earning / issuing Valuns? It will ultimately depend on how many people adopt the Valun as their means of exchange for common goods and services first and other more ambitious extensions into finance of larger purchases as actual wealth measured in Valuns grows within each community later.

Income taxes are obviously part of THEIR scam involving THEM acting by stolen fiat to issue “public” money. We can't be complacent about things or argue reality away: illegitimate or not, all this “public” money, including all accounts related to it, is real money; it fulfills the characteristics attributed to money save one, a store of value.
Since we maintain that money apart from a commodity basis cannot itself possess value without affecting all sales transactions and price structures, only a commodity basis can store value. But what is the basis of THAT value and who gets to decide it? Do you or I? No. Besides which we contend that you can have either a stable measure of value or a store of value, but not both. Our little experiment since 2011 has demonstrated that gold and silver prices are NOT stable, in dollars or anything else. If the basis of your money is incapable of maintaining steady prices, then it is insufficient as a measure of value; this would be like using a ruler with different measures on it each day while your are building a project, house or business.  
If you work for a business / organization / institution / machine that does not have a B membership in your local Valun exchange, you can still get a contract with the rest of the members of your exchange to earn and issue Valuns.

Let's say you work for a public water department and you live within the service area of the exchange. The water department is part of a public institution, a government, and therefore is at present disqualified as a B member (We predict, as did Riegel, without having to say so directly, that governments are more likely to become eventual exchange members than any “public” corporations). However, individuals that work there are permitted A membership. All that is necessary is for a regular pay stub to be presented and a Labour (British English spelling) Contract is drawn up on one page that describes the expected pay dates when Valuns will be issued and paid. The number of Valuns selected will have some reference to expected taxes as an upward limit.  

But there is another and it is another use of our 80% rule. In any job, you are earning “public” money and some of that is withheld for taxes. We're only interested in the take home pay. That would be your 100% base pay and so the number of Valuns you'd be allowed to issue would be up to 80% of the value in “public” money represented by that base pay. Example: if your take home, after tax pay is $100 a week, then depending on the dates on the Labour Contract, the dollar value of Valuns that day would be no more than $80 per week.
Perhaps at first the number of Valuns such would prefer earning alongside their “public” money would be smaller than they would be willing to pay themselves for their work in excess of the purchasing power represented by pay in “public” money. Later, as experience and familiarity grows, more Valuns will be earned / issued in this way. That's one reason for beginning with Labour Contracts of no longer than six months. Each contract can be adjusted differently.

Oh, and who issues the Labour Contract? Why, you do. It's part of the self-financing of all labor throughout our system. You, as the A member of your exchange, having some public job at a water department, have the right to issue your labor to your community for as many Valuns as you can pay the income taxes on up to 80% of your base pay. You are offering the community to continue working and thereby earning extra purchasing power (besides your “public” money) that you agree to spend and receive among the other members of any exchange using Valuns, anywhere Valuns are recognized and received, but primarily locally among other exchange members.

Likewise, should you be an A member working for a company (a public corporation) which cannot be a B member, you can issue a Labour Contract for additional Valuns paid to you on the dates you would normally be paid in “public” money, again up to the 80% rule.

We described what happens in Labour Contracts at #78.and #79. 
To those who continually pressure for minimum wages in “public” money, this proposal is our answer. One reason E. C. Riegel got interested in this whole alternative money thing was his contention (shared by us) is that common labor of all kinds is universally underpaid. Nobody except those who do not work, but live from making money on money without actually sacrificing any time out of the rest of their lives, the capitalists, only THEY ever make money in the present system / machine. The present machine, we should and can easily see, is either incapable of or unwilling to, pay anyone more than they are currently being paid. This illustrates the fundamental ineligibility of all THEIR economic explanations. THEY extol usury, rigorously defined as the demand back of that which was never issued, which is stealing and of fractional reserve banking schemes, lending money one doesn't have, which is fraud. To hell with THEIR economics of apologetics for THEIR corrupt machine! Some of this blog constitutes an informed refutation of a few of THEIR ideas, but frankly we're not even that interested. Most of us have come with armed minds and baloney detectors. The more we know, the less we'd like even knowing them.

This blog is not about THEM or THEIR economic explanations for anything.

What can be salvaged for a new economics? We'll start with supply and demand and location and appreciate our own means of exchange, which shall be understood at each community level and eventually throughout the Valun trading communities worldwide. We do expect that over all costs of labor will rise, but will be covered by Valun acceptance and that costs for all products in Valuns will be lower and more stable.

But here's where we make it personal: if you do work (time taken out of the rest of your life) for a family member and you aren't getting paid for it, then your value is being causally exchanged, which does not diminish its value, but indicates that the worker does not reap any direct material benefit for their work; they have given their time or material products as gifts. The best things in life certainly ARE free and not determinable in money, but that does not dismiss the acknowledgment that a lot of labor goes unpaid, especially within our most important natural social units, extended families. What then? Do we demand that some state pay for it out of “public” money? Why? That strategy gives more power to those who have already abused it and anyway the basis for all of THEIR money is without basis. Contemplate if you will the other papers we have linked in this post.

An example would be two sisters, the elder with children, the younger without. The older needs the younger to watch her children while she works. Rather than pay her in dollars, pay her in Valuns. Hundreds of simple jobs would work this way under the proposal.

The entire market where Valuns are traded and accepted as the means of exchange we called a Valun Exchange Network or VEN, but then discovered someone had already called another bitcoin like commodity based money a VEN. So it goes.

David Burton 

[4/11/17: Q: I'd appreciate it if you could outline all the contracts a member would be subject to for joining an exchange. Owen, IA

A: Each member has a Membership Contract with their local exchange. Individual A members / owners of each exchange agree to pay a yearly dues of V1 (one Value Unit or Valun) in “public” money. Right now that would be $2.76 per year. The exchange opens an account similar to a checking account for the member with an opening issuance balance of V200 (two hundred Valuns). 

Each B member business gets an account and does not have to pay dues. We encourage all legitimate private businesses to join with as little cost as possible. It is expected that at least some of these businesses will be buying advertising from the exchange in local “public” money that will appear on the reverse sides of our circulating currency, the V-Check.

Movement of Value Units (Valuns) between accounts constitutes a transaction. We regard a transaction as between an issuer/buyer and a receiver/seller: the buyer is paying Valuns to the seller. Each exchange will charge a fee of one tenth of one percent (.01%) to the buyer. This means that it takes V1 to move V1,000 from one account to another and the least one pays is V.01 (one cend or one fen) to move V10 (ten Valuns) or less. 

The other function of each exchange is as a private meeting place where each member gets to advertise for goods or services available in Valuns. It will be at the level of bulletin boards rather than the internet, although websites for each exchange that perform this service are bound to spring up. As we all know, information is everything and we will want to know what jobs are available and how to apply, etc. One might see jobs offered in combinations of Valuns and “public” money. Examples of values might be in the range of 5 to 2 or 10 to 1. 

For instance, I would be perfectly happy to sell most of my services in my chosen discipline for V5 + $2 an hour. It works out to around $15 / hr. Other jobs would prefer V10 + $5 which would be more like $32 / hr. This would be all in line with exactly what E. C. Riegel would have liked to see develop. His only problem was implementation. 

(4/11/17) We assume that many, most, all of the businesses that become B members buy ads from the exchange which show on the reverse sides of our money, the circulating V-Checks. They buy this advertising from us in “public” money and take the money they spend off their taxes as a legitimate business expense. 

We expect all exchanges to print and circulate V-Checks in the following denominations: V½ at about $1.38, V1 at $2.73, V2 at $5.46, V5 at $13.66, and eventually the rest, V10 at $27.31, V20 at $54.62, V50 at $136.55 and V100 at $1,365.50 ! We have already seen laws that indicate nothing of less value than $1 can be circulated as alternative money and there may be rules concerning the circulation of anything above a certain dollar amount. For the time being, coinage is the unique province of the state. Although E. C. Riegel had some ideas about coins and we entertained them and even though small round shallow cylinders of metal of various sizes is an impressive invention by itself, we can just as well accomplish a lot by using good 80 lb paper and making our money look as attractive as it needs to be to convey its message: the bearer of this V-Check herewith tenders whatever number of Valuns (international standard Value Units) in exchange for whatever product or service is offered for sale in them. 

V-Checks have six month expiration dates like regular checks and like coupons, but even if expired they can be exchanged for new V-Checks with new expiration dates or deposited into an account.]

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

#0: Paul Craig Roberts - New World Order Explained 2017

Paul Craig Roberts - New World Order Explained 2017

We have reason to believe that this interview took place many months prior and was re-published.  Just because Trump scrubbed it does not mean it is dead.  What Roberts informs you of is that unless you are one of THEM (globalists, etc.) and have plenty of THEIR money ... then you basically have no rights and no future.  That's why this blog exists.  That's why this blog's proposal is so important.  How much has conditioning worked?  Pretty damn well.  It even has many who have tried climbing the increasingly slippery ladder to have given up the climb.  Just as well, since the whole damn thing was rigged from the outset.  But exposure is underway.  Even so, the governments are at the mercy of corporations and the banks and THEIR money behind it all.  Commerce in anything like bitcoin?  That's just some more of THEIR money.  Bags of gold and silver coins?  More of THEIR money.  How about you yourself?  What are you worth?  Read this blog and understand the proposal and then ask yourself again.  Also take note, ALL governments are THEIR slaves.  So is every single last political party on the face of the democratic earth.  Expect nothing good for you from them as they are enslaved as well.

Be seeing you

Tuesday, March 28, 2017



The subject of this news documentary was one of the motivations behind this blog.  We have said that human institutions of all kinds are essentially machines from a systems analysis perspective.  Paying close attention to what is disclosed here, shows that there are fundamental problems with our machines, which have to do with the people involved, but more importantly the MONEY used to keep the cover ups and corruption going.  
Notice also there are instances of out and out theft of other people's money described.  Whether we concur or not with the general feeling that this subject and these people are vermin or whatever is not the main point.  The main point concerns BROKEN PUBLIC TRUST in our human institutions.  If a machine no longer functions properly it is usually considered for replacement or demolition.  But being independent of any and all of it, as much as that's possible, one could simply decide to "bug out" and try it alone.  
There is a lot of genuine romanticism (fantasy) associated with this growing bug out  trend.  Humans really cannot mostly go it alone.  So we will need our own money so that we will no longer have any reason to accept a bunch of THEIRS for something that runs deep into the heart of the whole damn political/economic society of the present world; for pedophilia!  Imagine.  When this issue crossed my path personally in the 1980's in New York City, I was of course completely shocked.  But I shouldn't have been because it was definitely going on in the high school I attended.  So it must be going on everywhere.  Soon we shall wake to the anciently predicted realization that we are everywhere being ruled by people of the worst possible character, people who even privately gloat about it.

So who controls the media, the police, the schools, the other institutions mentioned in this documentary?  We're posting it here because this material has been verified.  No, there is a more fundamental way than bugging out, it is to associate ourselves together and merge the recognition of our common will (FIAT) represented by our own money.  Then, we can get free of THEM (globalists, bankers, elites, pedophiles, satanists, etc. and you are guilty by association so why are you working for them?)  We know, it's THEIR money, stupid!  

Be seeing you  
Oh, and here's the rest of the story in another documentary



Wednesday, March 15, 2017

#57.7 Perspective - The Proposal and the Community.

Conversations lately have involved just what we're trying to accomplish here. So we use a few posed questions and our responses:

What's the first message or lesson you have for everybody?

Take a look at the money you use. None of it is yours. It belongs to someone else, to a bank, not you. You get to use it, that's all. From the standpoint of the people who actually own the money, you are obviously looked down upon as slaves or serfs. After all, if it can be demonstrated as accomplished that most are too poor ever to imagine ever traveling far from where they began, then they are indeed serfs; tied to where they are. That may or may not be a bad thing. It depends on many things including money. Being in Venezuela right now would not be so lucky.

That all things civilized relate directly to money is the study of history and the same in reverse. We gave our minimum reading list back here. After all, there are some reading requirements. This blog's subject is about as serious as it gets. We fully expect the best and brightest to appreciate this and that the day to day operations of a local exchange organization might appeal strongly to their sense of responsibility. After all, we will need those taking vanguard positions to fully understand from their own personal experience what taking responsibility means.

We would prefer to stick to the present political boundaries as service areas, so each exchange would minimally serve each county. Each exchange would be run by a minimum of three and at most thirteen board members and the positions of president, vice president and secretary the same as in any “public” corporation, would rotate among twelve of them, probably having terms of a year, and the thirteenth would in all cases be an attorney representing the exchange. Sorry if you don't think so, but lawyers are essential; like having a hired gun.

No exchange will ever be set up as a stock company. Instead they will seek membership by dues payable in the local money, with dues being V1 (one Valun) per year. Right now, that would be $2.82 (3/14/17) which for most people is nothing.

All individual members are A members. A membership rules would be anyone 18 years or older recommended by two other A members and lawfully having the right to live there and having been living there for at least a year. BTW, homeless people, who we have to consider, who have lived in an area for a year, would have to count for them. What would we be looking for? Willingness to work. What do we call work? Time out of the rest of your life for which you earn barter in terms of money; any time you are paid to do something. It's the only way up and out of any situation.

Since money's chief function is to split barter, in order to gain basic self respect for some people will require that they succeed within a smaller known group of traders. They have to have some skilled or semi-skilled labor to offer the rest of their community. The walls between neighbors have to come down. We don't know each other anymore. This association, through the local exchange will encourage more people to get out and get to know and work with each other. It offers everyone who participates the benefit of a truly honest monetary system based on something that does not change; a transaction in time between the two strongest of THEIR brands of money; US dollars and gold. It will never fall below $2.16 in fair trade value. Who says? We say! If gold manages to shoot the moon, perhaps the dollar is finished and some other public money capable of purchasing gold replaces it. If trading in gold folds, then we revert to setting the price of gold at V1,000 = 1 AU oz as at inception on 11/2/11. Our money wins any fight among THEIR money. If we did not think so and could not prove it by simple math, then why would we bother? Our money will be worth spending and saving and will outlast all their burst bubble economics and actually tend to mitigate against its effects long term. An alternative money supply you say? Yes, and something that is actually yours, not THEIRS. It will make all the difference, long term.

What's this blog's opinion concerning states?

Our position is exactly the same as E. C. Riegel's, plus informed by some further experiences since his time; it is essentially that the state is the economic and monetary prisoner of the central bank or banks and those who privately own them (and no, you or I nor the government can buy any of their shares, they are private institutions). Our criticism includes the following as basic assumptions

1) The central bank owns all the money. None of it is ours. The current process is that all issues of all the “public” money (which is really all THEIRS) are made in exchange for government debt instruments (bonds). Doing so by means of STOLEN FIAT from each of us, THEY (globalists, bankers, elites, PEDOPHILES, SATANISTS – you are what you are by association too) have no lawful or any other rational basis for having been granted this monopoly over “public” money, except that THEY (the thieves of other people's will through STOLEN FIAT) have had it for such a long time.

2) ALL the “public” money issued is illegitimate as money (there is something mathematically wrong with how it is issued) because real people did not issue it themselves in the process of carrying out trade. This leads to a few things; economic bubbles, opportunities for speculation by capitalists (people who are rich who make money on their money without work), relentless inflation, impossible ever to correct, relentless taxation and ultimately confiscation (wealth destruction), huge unpayable mountains of debt that are the cancer on economic (co-money) systems, leading to their death, usually in a crash or a Weimar meltdown (going on right now in Venezuela and heading for a nation near you).

INDIVIDUAL people are the only ones accorded by Riegel and us as having the NATURAL right to issue legitimate money. What makes it legitimate? If one issues one's money, one is expected to accept it back in return in trade. Literally, this is what “backs” any money; you issue it, you take it back. If you issue money but refuse to accept it back, you're money and your word are no good. Understood? Your money issue is a natural extension of your will. In fact, this is one of the rock solid bases upon which our proposed system rests. 

3) It is IMPOSSIBLE to tell which particular fractions or instances of “public” money is “sound” or “backed” from any that isn't; all dollars look alike. Is my particular dollar backed or not? As we've said before, nobody actually earning and spending dollars or any other “public” money ever knows or even cares. 

“Backed” stolen fiat money has been taxed back into the government's own treasury and re-spent. “Unbacked” stolen fiat money (which is by far the most of it - just consider the sovereign debt of various states these days) proliferates and continues to do so as the government spends more without taxing it back. 

Riegel described this as the watering down of purchasing power of each unit of money being diminished by the government spending of more of these spurious dollars, a dilution of their purchasing power that only benefits the government; they get the right to buy something first before anyone else. Does THAT fact make any sense? Why does any government deserve the right to spend money before you or I do?

Why is this important? Because what “backs” any money is what Riegel said backed it; whatever it is that is purchased by money backs the money that bought it; the transaction would have been barter, but it is accomplished by means of money; performing its principal reason for existence, to split-barter and relieve humanity from whole barter.

What backed the government's spending of a few billion on a jet plane? The jet plane. Did the government get a good deal on the plane or not? That's another question, but in the meanwhile, the money spent for it was actually “backed” by the plane itself.

4) KEY POINT – If you demand that the state issue all your money, then in order that prices not inflate, the state must tax all of it back within a fairly short span of time, within a year would be best. Why? Because the government is not wanted to participate in the economy in competition with us, as that would destroy our wealth. This is a point completely ignored by Bill Still and others. 

Let's review a few things: Wealth to us is not wealth unless it provides a regular income. To the extent that any machine, procedure, activity, whatever, no longer produces an income, it becomes mere depreciating stuff. What's important about depreciation? It's where ALL money goes to die! Impositions of taxes and other deterrents to earning income result in the destruction of wealth. Has anyone else ever told you that? Not likely. Why? Because most economists only preach the benefits of THEIR system and their first mistake has been in believing the soundness of the institutions they promote; all of which are polluted by the curse of usury, the mathematical impossibility of paying back that which was never created, always creating a scarcity of money and growing tumors of ultimately unpayable debt everywhere.

So looking around you, you see state after state in the process of destroying wealth. The commonwealth was the wealth that would provide income (a living) to the community that lived there. The state relied on that for its own benefit. But not anymore. Now, all states are pawns of banks. It's THEIR money, stupid! Have lots of it stashed away in mattresses? Tough, it's still THEIRS and THEY could take it away from you easy as that. Gold? Silver? THEY can claim that if necessary too.

So whatever one's politics, it is not the right or purpose of lawful states to destroy wealth. It is the common history of despotisms of various kinds which does however destroy wealth. We are sorry, Bill Still and others, it is NOT the role of government to be issuing any money, nor granting any monopoly to some private group of individuals to do so. This was Napoleon's solution and Mugabe's solution, it can't but lead to inflation for all the reasons described above. It is tactically and mechanistically an INCORRECT assumption for a monetary system to allow any states to issue money, period. To us, it is all illegitimate and unstable for use as money and long term (perhaps even short term) it will fail.  

What then is the role of a state? 

To preserve law and order. To proclaim law and keep order: law which is FORCE and order required for doing anything constructive and to prevent destructive activities. To seek to promote and protect the lives, freedoms and property of its citizens. These are the proper roles for states.

In the United States it has been customarily believed that the first ten amendments to the Constitution, OUR Bill of Rights, without which the thing would never have passed, have been or are being preserved, when current events reveal to the conscientious observer how far the present government of the United States has deviated from the original agreement, supposedly between the government and the people. But it wasn't that; it was a “commercial” agreement from the start between our ostensible government and THEM, from whom money would be borrowed and only gold and silver would be considered in settlement of debt because again, those precious metals are THEIR money, stupid! 

We contend that allowing any state to issue money is fundamentally incorrect; it was never granted in the original document and is certainly not part of the Bill of Rights which is OURS, not THEIRS. The Constitution of the United States is not in form or fact anything like the original and the farther up and into the present beast system one goes, one encounters attitudes which reveal how THEY view us and THEY care nothing for the Constitution. They believe Constitutionalists are deluded fools. Whose deluding them? THEY are! So what's the problem? The money, stupid! You may have gone to some of America's finest schools and met some charming and stunning people with dizzying intellects, but all along you never gave a thought to the money you used every day and how you were affected by it. 

The Constitution was an agreement to set up a government that would be able to borrow money from THEM. The articles of the thing describe said government (and THEY constantly try and find ways to exploit anything in there against us at every turn to this very day). Tacked onto the original Constitution were ten amendments; the Bill of Rights. These are OUR side of the agreement; we want the government to abide by these rules, and if they don't, the agreement has been abrogated, broken, dissolved!

Constitutionalists have been deluded into thinking we should return to a strict interpretation of something, when the very government deciding things, breaks the Bill of Rights any chance it gets and THEY uniformly consider themselves above the law! Can we really expect, or should we wait around for anything of any conceivable relief from this system, these people, these institutions? Why bother? Hence you have the general public's disgust for politics, politicians, parties and even and above and behind everything, from THEIR secret societies, THEIR intelligence organizations, etc. Most people in fact would really like to bug out.

To keep law and order, a state requires money. It should not borrow from any but us, which means that all debt instruments a state ever uses to borrow money must be sold to and traded among its lawful citizens ONLY because we are paying the state to do its job for us. Hence all current trading in sovereign debt as a means to settle matters of international trade or to stabilize a currency for the benefit of some obscure speculators making money on money without work, is inherently destructive of national sovereignty and is in the worst possible interests of all states and of all peoples. Who does it benefit? Again, it benefits those who own the money; THEM.

We are unlikely to see any state forced to rely on its citizens to support it until our money becomes the only money that survives. Since THEIRS has a fatal flaw built in (many actually), it is only a matter of time before things get … unsustainable for THEM as THEIR money fails.

Your blog seems to contain a lot of philosophy, or something political. Can you say what it is you are trying to start and how it might be only a reversion to hippie communism, etc.? Do you advocate starting a cult? Is your solution a secret society? How does it interface with existing communities?

I looked at this the way I have tended through experience and training (systems analysis) to see things; as essentially human run machines. Human institutions are nothing but machines and their procedures are nothing but mechanical and can be understood from that direct perspective. 

Since we are dealing with machines, and in fact deciding to set up our own, there is no philosophy or religion about it except as I have said, a pretty universal recognition of what SANITY is and what it isn't and most live in the REASONABLE EXPECTATION of continuing peace. We know who we are, what we are, what we do, what we like and what we don't like, what we need and don't need, what we expect, etc. and it may change from place to place, but basic civility is pretty easy to see and usually does not require a state to enforce some external law. In most cases, people are able to decide most issues among themselves locally. Of course there are exceptions and for those reasons communities have resorted to states.

So, any human institution is a machine. The government is a machine. Schools are machines. Farms are machines. The military branches are machines. The banking system is a machine. Money is the current flowing through these machines. Debt is an energy drain to all such machines. The completely self serving idea of a limited quantity of anything serving as money (bitcoin, gold, silver) is something that goes back into the distant past and has enabled THEM to remain in power. THEY and THEIR economics will claim that it limits inflation. Riegel's common sense analysis of that issue reveals this claim to be a flat out LIE! Inflation always results from unbaked government issued money outnumbering (literally) any backed government issued money (money taxed back into the treasury that is re-spent back into the economy). There isn't any other fundamental reason except supply and demand and the costs of transport to various distant places.

And to answer another possible misconception; advocating the creation of any other alternate utopian society, is not inferred or even necessary. In fact, what we have now is the direct result of decisions that each of us made under the circumstances and has to be regarded as the natural standpoint from which we decide to move, change, develop, etc. We don't need more FAKE societies. If people want to form those among themselves, that's their own choice. All we advocate is that the people, whoever they may be, must have recourse to their own monetary machine. This machine would comprise an alternative to THEIR monetary system, it would be owned by everyone that used it, not as THEIR system is really owned by THEM not us or even by our governments. It would be regarded as a social overlay rather than an alternative society. It would co-exist along with the present system until the present order fails. So in a way, participation in a Valun system would be seen as a form of monetary insurance.

The kind of organization it would most resemble would be a private club, or more exactly a network of private clubs. Each functional locus of this network would provide the accounting required to maintain our money, each of our individual accounts. For the time being, the functional currency we would use would be the V-Check, the standard the money is based upon the proposed International Standard Value Unit or Valun.

As proposed, a Valun is a unit of purchasing power that does not change. The current value of all Valuns is the present value of that unit of purchasing power. There are after all certain common sense sayings that everyone should know: there's only one way to save money; save money. There's similarly only one way to preserve purchasing power; preserve purchasing power.

What determines that change and how is that perceived by us? THEY determine what THEIR money is worth in THEIR terms. Since our Valun does not move, we get to see how all the rest of their money fares against ours; THEIRS gets less and less valuable and ours retains its purchasing power.

Choosing the unit of purchasing power to base our money on is very important. It must be a transaction that is between two of THEIR most important brands of money; gold and US dollars and it must be at a time near or at the top of gold's value in dollars. We chose a date that is easy to remember and an opening bid price that is also easy to remember:

1 AU oz = $2,160 on 11/2/2011

Take $2,160 and divide by a thousand and that's your Valun at inception; $2.16. Right now, due to THEIR valuation of gold (and silver), a Valun is $2.82 (3/8/17). By design, the Valun shall never fall below $2.16 as the moment it does so would signal a new inception point for the Valun, always higher, never lower.

Then when precious metals fall back in price in dollars, the Valun just gets harder, retaining its purchasing power against everything else including gold and silver. If we didn't advocate something that was unbeatable, why would we bother?

If the dollar can no longer acquire gold it is DEAD to us. We'd have to seek some other currency, THEIR strongest currency. As for why we can't base our Valun strictly on gold, the reason is simple; THEY determine what gold is worth in all the rest of THEIR currencies that can acquire gold, not us. Gold and silver are still THEIR money and until we can be said to control all the mines, mints, exchanges, etc. precious metals will remain THEIR oldest brand of money, not ours. All who think otherwise are dupes, deliberately lured by THEM into the oldest lust in the world, the lust for gold, which drove all major conflicts in ancient times and still acts behind the scenes today. All of it has human blood on it too.

THEIR money, not ours: If we did not issue it in trade for something that backed it, whatever it was, then that money, whatever it is, precious metals or not, that money is not ours. To the extent that we plan, save, determine our futures using THEIR money, we are its slaves and THEIR slaves and of course the literature is replete with THEIR “big useless plans” intending that we are THEIR slaves and how best to manage us, usually described in terms fitting either cattle or insects.

Let's say that gold became worth a dollar an oz, what would a Valun be worth? Around $4.32 We do intend on having the hardest money in the world, not the most inflation prone. But a lot are losing patience with civilization itself and are really interested in bugging out of it. That trend foretells a Dark Ages to come if it continues. 

Want out? A lot do. People who are able to live at the edges of society in self sustained settings are more often considered lucky these days. But even so, though it be far less, all external and meaningful trade is in terms of THEIR money, not yours or mine, which at this time does not exist. Our proposal would even help these people living outside the normal currents of society. But all of it takes a resolution and an idea of what is involved. The kinds of people who would likely bring this about are naturally sociable and attractive and it doesn't take all that much to achieve either. A cheerful disposition is always preferred. A businesslike confidence in the project of getting something like this going is a requirement. Interested in becoming a leader in your community? Prove it by attracting followers. Become their lightning rod. Advocate something truly independent that will ultimately link up perfectly well with any similar organizations set up under the same simple rules elsewhere around the world; let the people work/issue their own money. People have value, not things. Why not start with each of us? What can we do? How well do we value it? Would others be willing to buy or exchange for it? Perhaps those who want what we want don't have what we want. That's the problem with barter. The alternative money which is really ours solves that.

David Burton

[3/21/17 Q: What would be your prognosis for the Valun? Does it go up or down over the next few months? You say never lower than $2.16 so what happens when gold becomes $3,000 an ounce? What happens if gold reaches $5,000 an ounce?

A: We first remind everyone that gold is THEIR money, one of THEIR oldest brands. Gold markets are susceptible to influence on the upside by any possible outbreak of insecurity leading to war and sometimes price rises are a good barometer of those events, but just as likely rises in the price of gold are the results of some local insecurity. Whatever it is, we don't care. It's THEIR money. All we care about is our initial transaction.

1 AU oz = $2,160 on 2/11/2011

If the price of gold rises above $2,160 a new initial transaction supplants the present one, always higher, never lower, by absolute design. So if the price should rise to $2,500, the new initial transaction becomes:

1 AU oz = $2,500 on Whatever Date

Divide by a thousand and $2.50 become your new initial value and then if the price of gold falls, which it normally will, the present value of that new initial transaction will just go up.

Over the next six months? Next year? Next decade? I don't know, but I guarantee you it will always exceed $2.16 by design! 
Q: So seriously, even religion, faith and science I suppose are nothing but machines?
A: Yes, exactly! Now whether or not you or I think so, THEY (globalists, bankers, elites, pedophiles, satanists, etc.) are entirely pragmatic when it comes to all of these human institutions which can easily be seen as essentially mechanical organizations, therefore machines. To suggest that they accomplish nothing but activities inimical to long term human survival is not within the domain of this blog. That is covered elsewhere and is up to you to become informed or not. It took all independent researchers time to read and view and reflect upon the data, the grammar, that was then subjected to whatever passed for logic and became their rhetoric; the message each researcher had to provide. This blog's proposal is based on readily predicable results and therefore could be said to be “scientific” but it is not particularly associated with that machine which we identify as academic or establishment science. It is designed to be neutral as regards any known religions; we consider religions to be a different order of machine than a monetary system. However, our proposal eliminates both usury and fractional reserve lending. Under its simple rules, it will be impossible to lend money one does not have and to ask back that which was never created. Our advancements in account record design will allow all our members to manage their debt burden far better than in the “public” money accounts available to most people today. We will adhere to a fifty year debt cycle wherein all debts must be settled within that time and a year of jubilee is enforced every 50 years. It is not in the genius of money as one of the greatest human inventions to enslave us all in debt.]