I realized after posting this that Riegal's analogy and its use of Samson was very unfortunate. Samson after all killed himself when he brought down the temple of the Philistines. So the difference between us and Sampson is that we do nothing to bring down the temples of the Philistines who enslaved us. We merely walk out from under THEM and THEIR temples and begin with our own institutions and our own money.
When man has mastered money he shall have mastered not only his economic problem of prosperity but also his political problem, for he will see that money has no place in state functions, and, the money power being entirely in his own hands, he will easily master the state and clearly define its services. Thus money must be seen as the means of mastery of all economic and political problems. Until we have mastered money we shall not master any of our problems. Not money, but a false money system, is the root of all evil.
As we continue to say, present day politics has nothing to do with economic freedom. Nothing. Because all THEIR money, though it functions as money, is illegitimate to begin with, as Riegel will shortly point out. Without we ourselves being the issuers of our own money, we have no role in the present ordering of any state functions. THEIR money and the lusts therefrom are all the root of all evil, not money itself or having it our way, which should have long been the case, except we have been ignorant of the subject for literally thousands of years.
As long as we cling to the superstition that we must look to government for money supply, instead of requiring it to look to us, just so long must we remain the subjects of government and it is vain to follow this or that policy or party or ism in the hope of salvation. We can control government and our own destiny only through our money power and until we exert that power it is useless for us to debate the pros and cons of political programs.
Understood? It's not your money, it's THEIRS. Until all state business is conducted using OUR money, we have absolutely no control or command over any state whatsoever! There is no debate possible on this subject. None!
When government is invested with money power it rises above the citizen and under the profession of protecting him may actually constitute the greatest threat to his well-being and safety. The power which control of the money system gives to government to interfere in and direct and even take the life of the individual should not exist on this earth. No man or group of men is warranted in holding this terrible power over fellow men.
But THEY do presently have it. We have identified it as law, which is FORCE. Law can be misguided and FORCE wrongfully exercised. But behind it all is THEIR money, which is all illegitimate and prone to fail. There is no remedy for this situation except to let THEM and THEIR system run its course to its inevitable demise. It's already happened many times in history and is going on right now everywhere. THEIR system is doomed entirely due to its illegitimacy and there are laws and FORCE behind THEIR eventual failure as well, because THEY have continually defied many laws which have FORCE behind them as deadly as gravity when defied. What have we always said? It's time to move out from under THEM and away from THEM until THEY finally fail and THEIR blood soaked illegitimate STOLEN FIAT money is no more.
Money is an instrumentality of the profit motive and must be issued and backed only by private enterprisers. Economic and political perversities are inescapable while government is admitted to money power. Since all national governments have, up to the present, been money issuing powers we may justly attribute all the economic and political ills of mankind to this single error.
A moment here to discuss the profit motive. Profit = a financial gain, especially the difference between the amount earned and the amount spent in buying, operating, or producing something. Therefore without profit or the desire to earn a profit, there are no legitimate businesses anywhere. Understood? Those who believe that anything is possible without profit are or should be rudely thrust out of any business and any arguments concerning business, as the stupid asses of Marxism, the weaponized ideology of class hate that was started by the elites to conquer utterly the rest of the world and subject it to THEIR rule. Notice that Riegel identifies the money issuing power of governments as responsible for all the economic problems we face. We wholeheartedly agree, which is why playing games within THEIR system to make more of THEIR money only makes matters worse.
Money power means budget power and it is folly to imagine that the citizen can control government unless he can control its budget.
So we the people taking any measure of control or command over our governments would imply that any and all money they get to spend must come directly from us, not as presently as borrowed by governments from banks and paid back by endless taxes to these banks plus interest which is always stolen value from us since all interest must come from money that was never issued, thus guaranteeing that there will never be anywhere near enough money.
Until we realize that our money power is our sovereign power we cannot act as sovereigns.
Sovereignty has been a hot topic among patriots for years, but it has absolutely no meaning at all without we the people issuing our own money. We can't even begin to imagine what each of us as sovereign people amounts to because as we have seen everywhere revealed around the world, the degree to which people are still subject to illegitimate uses of FORCE, privation, slavery, etc.
To rail and rant against tyranny is to manifest inferiority, for there is no tyranny but ignorance; to be conscious of one's powers is to lose consciousness of tyranny. Self government is not a remote aim. It is an intimate and inescapable fact. To govern oneself is a natural imperative, and all tyranny is the miscarriage of self government. The first requisite of freedom is to accept responsibility for the lack of it.
Railing against tyranny is futile if the tyrant has sufficient FORCE to crush any opposition, as has been demonstrated and will be demonstrated until people by the tens of millions finally say NO MORE and pull out and away from THEM. Who are THEY again? Broadly speaking, THEY are globalists, bankers, elites, technocrats, satanists, pederasts, scribes and Pharisees. Yes, the two last groups certainly still exist.
If the government were obliged to come to the people for money instead of vice-versa, the people would keep government under control and operate their economy satisfactorily with prosperity and peace resulting. The peoples of the nations do not make war. For them peace is the natural and permanent order. Wars are planned and perpetrated by politicians and their diplomats; and the money power of government is the means by which the people are maneuvered into wars.
Yes, we have stated many times that most people live under the reasonable expectation of continuing peace. We have also stated that most people are very well aware of the difference between sanity and insanity and most regard war mongering as insanity and we do not require any so called mental health profesisonals to point out the difference to us.
Money can be issued only in the act of buying, and can be backed only in the act of selling. Any buyer who is also a seller is qualified to be a money issuer. Government, because it is not and should not be a seller, is not qualified to be a money issuer.
Since only buyers can issue legitimate money, and it is only backed by what it buys, we have made it clear that only those buying their employment are legitimate money issuers and that whatever work they contribute backs any money they issue. The proposal recognizes this as Labor Contracts. This blog is right now replete with details.
As has been stated, the purpose of money is to split barter into two parts so that the seller is free to find his source of supply later and elsewhere. This is the sole purpose of money. Any effort to use money to serve another purpose is perversive; and this statement condemns the entire managed money philosophy.
It further and forthwith condemns any and all commodities functioning as money, so the economists are dead wrong about money being in any sense a holder of value. That's an idea that only appeals to money lenders and the present system. It's also why all cryptocurrencies are junk money and never to be trusted.
Money power cannot be separated from democratic power without miscarriage and ensuing frustration - political and economic. Democracy implies the sovereignty of man; and, since man cannot be sovereign without the money power, there can not be democracy under the political money system.
Understood? To E C Riegel, any ideas concerning democracy were associated with sovereignty of the individual, which is impossible under the present system. Riegel did not advocate any political activism whatsoever. He perhaps thought that some of the powers that be would see things his way and attempt to bring monetary freedom about using some of THEIR people and institutions. We know far better now. The only thing we want from THEM is ultimately to be rid of THEM. The only way to do that, in the United States, is to exercise our 1st Amendment rights, NOT to speak with whomever we choose, NOT to associate with whomever we choose and to publish whatever we please NOT for THEM to censor or otherwise criticize anything we do or plan to do. The message is “come out of her, my people” not to sit down with our enemies and seek any compromise with THEM.
Meanwhile, we are grateful for our blessings at this time of year and wish any and all who are with us a very happy Thanksgiving.
Best
David Burton
dpbmss@mail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment