[10/16/20 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, the OWNERS of the platform have decided to censor this channel and make this report unavailable. This proves what we have been saying on this blog from inception; that certain things we use and take for granted aren't really ours to begin with. Our money for instance is not really ours. So someday the OWNERS may decide to call it all back in and give you something else of less purchasing power in return. Think THEY can't or won't? It has certainly happened before. THEY don't care as long as when the dust clears, THEY remain in charge. That's all this represents. So we will need our own money and our own everything else too. I'm leaving this up to remind you. Be seeing you.]
Two
matters: 1) More visits from Russia. If they're really from Russia,
good and thank-you. If not, then scram! 2) The name of Rothschild comes up more often as a
label for THEM. We suggest that it's simplistic to stop there. As
for the market? We're not in it, we warned people to stay out, to
play at their own risk with any of THEIR money which they might have
too much of. This might be “the big one” that finishes off the
easy money, “carry trade” and other highly leveraged speculations.
Hint: what does one do when one has huge debts to pay? One jacks up the
stock market in hopes that the equities prices, proceeds of sale will
be able to hold the debt monster back a bit longer.
Bill
Holter's read of events and where it ends up is that everything gets
leveled. Sean brings up cryptocurrencies, the phony commodity “buy
and hold” “digital air.” Holter's description of what happens
to silver and gold are certain. If delivery doesn't happen at
the market price then no metals move, period! In fact, if THEIR
manipulated markets fail, and all of them will from time to time,
then it will be our little experiment here, that establishes what we
deem ounces of gold and silver to be worth, not in THEIR money, but
in ours. We may be the only ones in town to cash out your metals.
Of course in that case speculation would be useless and prices would
probably stabilize somewhere. Establishment of price by price
discovery not price planning by forced cost accounting, etc.
Holter
assumes the internet is in our future. I'm almost as certain as that
the trend is toward decentralization and away from anything like the
present trend to centralization and total tracking and even away from
the grid in most senses that is going to render internet access a
whole lot less likely. It may be unhealthy besides anyway. The
control meme is losing credibility by the day; the curtains are
drawing back and we see the worst possible people engaged in great
dangerous follies, all contending for the right to tend the sheep.
Sean calls it a beast system, and Bill mentions the second coming.
Seems to me they'd both best consider just who the whore of Babylon
is. Those who feel things in their bones have some sense of serious
impending changes.
Meanwhile
this is our allotted task: to contend that money must spring forth from
each one of us to be legitimate; that it is only backed by what
brought it into existence to be settled by whatever backs it in
trade; that it must represent an unchanging piece of purchasing power
relative to all other systems of monetary exchange, an international
standard not itself subject to speculation; and that to set up a
system would require surprisingly little in resources and would
actually inevitably benefit any state or community that adopted it.
A
Valun system would remove from consciousness certain very bad ideas;
for instance that anyone can be bought for the right price, when
under a Valun system, anyone may seek to buy their employment and be
paid back in one's own money; this is how most Valuns are issued.
The Valun system presents a humane system that is kind to the
illiterate among us of which it is likely that they be upwards of
40%.
How
are Valuns, or any other money, destroyed? By purchasing things that
cannot be sold for what you bought them for. It's called
depreciation, which by the way proves all current varieties of
economics unsound as regards money. Money must be replenished or
else economies die.
So money considered as a scarce
commodity, like gold or silver, etc. is settling barter by an
intermediary that itself fluctuates enough to be annoying (-20% in
five years) and in any case is controlled by outside speculators.
Criminality has been discovered there and all precious metals do have
blood on them!
Every single time that you buy something that
cannot be resold for what you bought it for, you closed a barter
transaction for more than you can get out of it in future and to you,
that money is lost, never to return.
The metals bigots will
tell you that in the end you still will have gold and silver if
they're the only money. Certainly, we say, somebody will have them.
Used to be the kings and the bankers. The circulation was FORCED by
taxes. And furthermore someone who has them will be able to con
people into parting with other useful things to acquire them, but
what are they worth really? If there weren't an active market for
them, why wouldn't an ounce of gold go back to $32 and silver to $5?
In a really slow economy grinding society down for two or three
generations, perhaps they would. Or some government edict would
FORCE them to some compliance under terms of which fewer circulating
dollars would be backed by them and all to save an essentially
fraudulent system.
Money issuance is the key to having
money. It must be by FIAT! YOUR fiat, not that of any stolen from
you by some government or bank! If you didn't issue it, it ain't
yours, despite possession of it being 9/10ths of the law. The only
reason to use it is where we are FORCED to do so, beginning with all
taxes.
So while we wait for the second coming, and come to
grips with exactly who the whore of Babylon might be, let's at least
admit we've learned a thing or two about money, one of our more
important inventions, along with weapons, musical instruments, books
and other important technologies. Be seeing you.
No comments:
Post a Comment