I
was recently asked to respond to how a proposed Valun would be
affected by the idea from Jim Willie that the price of gold and
silver might be set by the Chinese in their markets and that in such
cases they'd price gold at $3,000 / oz and silver at $50 an ounce.
Gold
at $3,000 spot exceeds the inception price of gold. But we'd want
our bid price which would be 25% above spot or $3,750 which would
under our rules provide a new inception point for all Valuns. Each
Valun would begin at the new inception at $3.75 and if the gold price
keeps going up, so does the Valun. What happens if gold in dollars
is priceless? Then the dollar is worthless, simple as that. It will
have become worthless as money long before that happens.
Similar figures would occur for silver. At $50 an ounce spot we get a bid price at $62.50 and divided by 3.75 = 16.67 Valuns per oz of silver at inception. I trust all of you see how that is done.
Similar figures would occur for silver. At $50 an ounce spot we get a bid price at $62.50 and divided by 3.75 = 16.67 Valuns per oz of silver at inception. I trust all of you see how that is done.
The
proposal is not based on commodities or commodities markets because
we allow THEM to determine all that while it lasts. We accept that
precious metals are still THEIR money. We have a proposal based on
an INCEPTION TRANSACTION instead of any commodity which THEY
determine the value thereof in THEIR money, all of which THEY treat
as commodities, so that THEIR speculators can continue their con
games robbing the rest of the general public through THEIR massive
speculation schemes. All of that business is capitalism NOT free
enterprise. In fact to prove the point, it's exceedingly difficult
for the average man or woman to set themselves up as any kind of
market maker or stock jobber or any other capitalist. Why? Because
you aren't rich, that's why. It's that obvious.
The
proposed inception transaction is $2,160 = 1 oz of gold on Nov 2,
2011. That made each Valun = $2.16 at inception. In order to
purchase the same purchasing power you'd have to pay the difference
in gold or silver prices. That means that since inception the
proposed Valun's fair trade has risen. Right now at 6/1/16 it's back
up to $2.81.
Now,
what happens when gold is set to $3,000 an oz.? First of all, will
it stay there or rise to as high as $6,000/oz of $10,000/oz.? We
presume that would the price of gold ever get that high, that the dollar would be
finished by then. What would we do? We'd choose a higher
transaction level involving gold and perhaps some other national
currency, whichever becomes the strongest. Riegel would certainly
have agreed as he was certain at his time that the US dollar had
become the legitimate strongest currency and his Valun would have
been based on a dollar at its lowest point in the inflation cycle or
he would have chosen another currency.
In any case, ours would always be based on gold and if there was any gold backed currency around, it would be based on their highest point in transaction trading activity at a point showing the highest price for gold. Again if that price becomes priceless in that money, that money will have become worthless, etc. We acknowledge that gold and silver are commodities worth some thing, but as Riegel maintained, we're never exactly sure what that value is. Therefore we choose a transaction to base our money rather than any commodity of it which we regard as frankly beside the point, as we regard with contempt and some venom the notion that money retains its value by being made deliberately scarce by some cabal of bankers.
In any case, ours would always be based on gold and if there was any gold backed currency around, it would be based on their highest point in transaction trading activity at a point showing the highest price for gold. Again if that price becomes priceless in that money, that money will have become worthless, etc. We acknowledge that gold and silver are commodities worth some thing, but as Riegel maintained, we're never exactly sure what that value is. Therefore we choose a transaction to base our money rather than any commodity of it which we regard as frankly beside the point, as we regard with contempt and some venom the notion that money retains its value by being made deliberately scarce by some cabal of bankers.
The
reason the proposed Valun will preserve its purchasing power is that
it is designed to do so. Any lingering sentiment that puts
forth the worthless and contemptible idea that money is some sort of
lake of potential liquidity that can affect any and all prices as a
commodity pricing all other commodities is frankly a mistaken view of
money.
Rather
it can be proved that money arises from someone buying something
whether a government or a human being, and that money is all borrowed
from a bank earning money on it in the form of taxes (that's right
they go to the bankers first) and that as money travels around it
eventually buys things which can no longer be resold for what they
were bought for and in that process money actually dies. In the
natural depreciation process more and more money dies and requires
replenishment which under the present order produces more debt from
usury extracting that eleventh marble (the actual cancer) until the
host economy finally dies for lack of money since it has all died out
of the system. Then of course the money itself buys less and less
until it in turn dies. What do those holding a lot of it end up
with? Would gold save them? If it really becomes priceless, maybe.
But the rest of us produce food and what would we want for our food
in THEIR gold? You see what happens? This is a merry-go-round.
This explains by the way exactly why the Monsanto GMO project was of banker origin; they want to control the food supply for “the masses.” They assume they will survive on something else despite their products ruining the natural environment. They don't care and have never really cared. Nature will ultimately take its course. But meanwhile, we should pursue, “come out of her, my people” and take back our own fiat and issue our own money and begin using it among ourselves.
Should
the proposed inception need to be raised, it will never be lowered by
design, it would involve the new transaction at a higher level,
always based on gold and some other of THEIR money and always tied to
a date in TIME. From then on, fair trade determines the present
value of that initial transaction. If the initial price of a Valun
rises from $2.16 to $3.75 if gold goes to $3,000/oz then tell me
which is better to want to earn, save or use in trade, dollars or
Valuns? Lots of people will begin to see things our way if that
happens.
David
Burton
Current Hypothetical Value of a Hypothetical Value Unit
[6/2/16: OK then if gold reaches $10,000 an oz. what the Chinese say they may base their new gold backed money on, what would the Valun be in dollars? Clint
It's acceptable bid price is $12,500 assuming we could even get our hands on any gold at that price, and hence V1 = $12.50 at inception, whatever date is chosen. That would be very heavy money with prices very much lower than any of us would be used to. V-checks might even be issued for example as V1, V1/2, V1/4, V1/8 with the V1/8 being $1.56.]
No comments:
Post a Comment